The Mueller indictments of the GRU Russia hackers. With all the specific details , I am wondering if you think Mueller’s findings are accurate and thorough or just fake news and part of the so called witch hunt. Let’s leave out for now whether the hacking had an impact on the election or whether the indicted Russians would ever be extradited. Was the special prosecutor accurate, thorough and professional?
Thanks
we have a legal case that both prosecutors and defendants have no intention to go to the court for it. More unfortunately you asked your question with legal frame (indictment), not from counterintelligence perspective. Mueller's stuff may be accurate enough as raw counterintelligence info, but for legal case, its accuracy has to be examed by court.
The worse possible day for Trump to establish that he is beholden to Putin was Monday in Helsinki. Yet he did anyway.
If wife confronts husband about cheating, not a good idea to go to lunch the next day with mistress in a restaurant frequented by wife’s friends.
If coach confronts player about not giving 100% at practice, not a good idea to oversleep morning workouts the next day.
We awake each day with the expectation that the sun will rise in the east and that our President will have our back. For the first time in US history, we no can rely upon the latter.
Ask yourself why. Because Mueller knows.
(no message)
"The Mueller indictments of the GRU Russia hackers." ... I didn't read them. I have always said we should go after hackers. I do wonder what took them so long with this. I guess they were spending a lot of time on the collusion investigation, and decided to set aside the hacking investigation. I've always thought it was a mistake for them to ignore the hacking issue. It certainly appears that they took up the hacking investigation right before the Helsinki summit so they could weaken the US president as much as possible...playing into the Russians hands, of course. That is a shame. But, that is where we are.
"With all the specific details..." ... again, I didn't read them. What are the worst details? I'd be happy to comment on them.
"...I am wondering if you think Mueller’s findings are accurate and thorough or just fake news and part of the so called witch hunt. Let’s leave out for now whether the hacking had an impact on the election or whether the indicted Russians would ever be extradited. Was the special prosecutor accurate, thorough and professional?" ...I have no idea if they are accurate or thorough. The timing of the indictments would seem to indicate that the indictments were political, which calls them into question. And, we know the FBI has mislead the courts before. But, we can just wait to see if they get any convictions out of this...that is, assuming they indicted to get a conviction, and not to play politics.
Announcing the indictments prior to Helsinki. I thought they teed it up perfectly for Trumpo to follow the script he had been given and at least make a shallow comment about Russian interference. Trumpo couldn’t even bring himself to do this. What’s interesting to me is that you rarely (if ever) take a view that Trumpo is responsible or accountable for his own words or actions. Wonder if you are raising your children this same way. Also note that’s Rosenstein briefed the President several days ahead of the Public announcement. Again teeing it up for Trumpo
As to what that means from me: I typically ignore his words. I don't like hearing them, and they are meaningless to me. I do, however, generally like his actions such as reduced FDA regulations, reduced EPA regulations, reduced labor regulations.... These things aren't being reported by the MSM, but they should be. I hear about them at industry meetings and through other channels, and I have to say, they are good developments. NATO stepping up to defend themselves...long overdue. And, of course, SCOTUS appointments.
Just because I don't post on a particular Trump tweet doesn't mean I support the tweet. I just see people trying to take Trump down, slow him down, all the time...and because of the good he does, I choose not to try to slow him down further myself. Why help out those who may eventually stop the good he is doing?
My kids are well aware that I don't like a lot of things Trump says. They hear my wife and I complain about his "diarrhea of the mouth" and the like, all the time. They know I would prefer it if he would shut up. But, they also know that I like many of the things he he has done. I suppose they are having to appreciate the strategy of "voting for the lesser of two evils." It is not a matter of supporting Trump as much as it is opposing the insanity of the Left and the anti-democratic never-Trumpers. My allegiance is not to Trump, but to the balance of substantive positive results relative to other options. Of course, it makes it easier for them to understand when the Left makes insane accusations against Trump and the Right. Racism anyone? Hacking proves collusion? Anti-free speech Lefties on campus? Abolish ICE! They see the crazy Left, and I think they understand. They don't have to emulate Trump to oppose his opponents. He is an awful president...he just happens to be the best constitutional option available right now, and tearing him down would be worse for the country than not tearing him down.
You can't cheat and try to take down a president on the one hand, and then expect to be fully trusted on the other. I do not trust the Russians at all, but i trust our own intel that came out under these people no more if it was politically beneficial to the Left. What they did was terribly damaging to the IC of the US and tragic. When they start fully releasing information that is not unnecessarily redacted, my trust quotient will go up considerably.
It's what they have done, so point your finger in the proper direction which is not the conservatives.
how current policy has affected leveraging the balance sheet and why rate increases don’t often result in higher bank profits.
I was just starting to have fun when you both went radio silent. Crickets.
This scheme to take down the President or would he be able to discover these cheaters in his investigation?
- but, I only listed those people who are clearly corrupt rather than those who are potentially corrupt because I like giving folks the benefit of the doubt - it's just the cool kind of guy that I am.
I have to say that it is hilarious that the Left would even pretend that they are surprised that conservatives don't trust the IC after all that they have done - based on their own words, actions, and IC internal investigations. Just because we don't trust the Russians doesn't mean that we have to trust our own sadly corrupt IC or vice versa.
I do think that there are mostly good, honest people in the IC however, and as moe of the Obama Deep State holdovers are rooted out, the better the situation will become.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Probably not worthy of the term "hacker". But as CC72's link points out, the referral of prosecution and open disclosure of the indictments indicate against "collusion". But to your original question, I have no problem with Mueller's investigation. We need more of this.
Why is Mueller handing off key cases?
Link: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/why-is-mueller-handing-off-key-cases
(no message)
Shuffling out this to the DOJ and not even using sealed indictments is pure political theater. The Special Counsel (there is no "Special Prosecutor") and his band of expensive Democrat hit men is a political hack on a witch hunt, which should be obvious even to hard core Trump haters.
So what in your post/link suggests any of these are or are not true?