I wonder who he will blame for this one?
(no message)
(no message)
Also, on top of this, Imagine the cost of cleaning up the mess from the damage that then Left/ANTIFA would cause protesting it.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
He saved this news for Friday.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Everything is binary for you? They will either take over, or they are harmless? I don't believe you really think that way.
(no message)
The organization that sends thousands of people to violently attack people?...or the organization that sends tens of people that don't attack anyone? It's a simple question. What say you?
It's just a relative question. You can say both can be safely ignored, and you may be right. I'm just trying to point out that you and the Left making a big deal about a such a small group, while ignoring a worse group, indicates that this is all politics, and no one is really worried about white supremacy. White supremacy has been defeated, but the Left keeps trying to resurrect it because that energizes its base. The Left needs racism in this country to retain power. Booker T. Washington saw that 100 years ago, and it is still true today.
of right wing nut crazies in Charlottesville in 2017.
Not sure of the relative security threat posed by that crowd. I passed on the legality of our city’s strategic police plan to deal with an antifa rally so I have some idea of their capability which isn’t that big right now.
(no message)
How about two orders of magnitude, based on the D.C. protests. Do we agree on that? Tens of white supremacists (at a national rally, no less) to thousands of Antifa?
If we agree that Antifa is much larger, and your only complaint is that "many" is an exaggeration, then we have made significant progress. They are much larger in members and in incidences of violence. And "much larger" is at least 2 orders of magnitude.
(no message)
(no message)