He also may have known her back then, drank and went to parties, so what? Apparently, she did much the same then and knew him.
If she was talking that kind of shit on me, I also would call her the accuser rather than by name.
And he would be crazy not to be advised by counsel when she is essentially charging him with being a criminal.
(no message)
Except maybe you.
(no message)
Neither of which he would have been convicted of even if she had gone to the cops the next day, rather than 36 years later.
But based on framing I have to assume it's bullshit.
(no message)
Open mind required.