And who paid for it?
Sen Lindsay Graham asked this tonight. And the answer can be only one thing that is already obvious to all. The Dems and Feinstein are lying again.
The left is built on lies. Caught red handed.
Her attorney had her take the polygraph.
This is not some conspiracy by the D's to wait until the conclusion of the Kavanaugh hearings then drop the big bombshell. It just took that long for Ford to decide she would allow her name to come forward - this isn't one of those TV moments from FOX TV where the accuser calls up the local precinct to report an incident and by morning of the next day it's front page news. She was vetted for truth by attorney's and WaPo for credibility. There wasn't some planning over two months and a half months - it should be noted, she called her congressman when she saw Kavanaugh's name as a possible choice by Donny dipshit.
She has known about it for months. She releases the information 1 week before the confirmation vote in order to delay the vote... and that is her only reason. She doesn't care about the lady, it is an ends to a mean. Welcome to D.C. politics. She wasn't waiting the lady to decide if she wanted to remain unknown.... if that were the case, the name wouldn't have been withheld until the end of the weekend. I am laying odds that the lady will not even testify now in Congress because she has no clue what happened at the party; she was likely blitzed herself and couldn't tell you who she actually slept with and whether or not it was consensual. Who would want to be broadcast to the public answering the question... "can you say definitively that Mr. Kav was at the party, with 100% certainty, and he committed this act against you after you had drank more than one beer?"
(no message)
Link: She didn't want to be identified but was vetted by WaPo anyway.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
I believe Kavanaugh and the plane load of women who actually know and knew him and affirm his good character. I don't believe a pshcho with an agenda who can't remember when or where she was alledgedly assaulted, how many people were there (can't get her story atraight) and hates Trump.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Feinstein should be called before the Senate ethics committee for her part in this deplorable charade.
To this day, they hold him in high esteem, despite a credible rape allegation by Juanita Broaddrick. As long as they do that, they have no business making this an issue regarding Kavanaugh.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
There's more to come BaronVonFauxBot.
Read the article and please explain that there's not more to come?
Here's a little tidbit for you to chew on in the meantime -- - "Sanai said that he did not hold Kavanaugh responsible for Kozinski’s behavior, but rather that his claim of ignorance was not credible and could be contradicted by witnesses. Kavanaugh’s credibility has become a central issue in his confirmation, as he has “unequivocally” denied allegations that he sexually assaulted Christine Blasey Ford when both were in high school."
Link: https://theintercept.com/2018/09/17/cyrus-sanai-federal-court-employees-attempted-to-come-forward-to-chuck-grassley-and-dianne-feinstein-neither-responded/
Sure, polygraph examinations are inadmissible in a courtroom, yet law enforcement uses them as an investigative tool.
Sexual Assault victims often have no witnesses or forensic evidence.
You assume that the woman is a paid political prop. Yet, you have never heard her story. There is a hearing on Monday. Perhaps it makes sense to reserve opinions until the after hearing.
to delay until after the midterm elections. I assume that you are pretending since even you aren't stupid enough to not know what is going on here, are you?
I'm not sure how you can sit here with a straight face and pretend this is real. I'd respect you more if you just admitted that you were taking a head shot at Kavanaugh in an all out political brawl. Don't be a doofus, marine.
(no message)
(no message)
I also think the Dems actually think that they ight win the senate back - they won't, but that's what they think.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
definitely help the GOP in the midterms.