BJ at a Bay Area lifestyle party about a decade ago. If her husband hadn't been so interested in jerking off, I'm sure he would have attacked me once he saw how excited his wife was. I've struggled with it for years, but it came out in my therapy a few years back. I just couldn't come to grips with the cuck scenario. I swear there were other couples there, but the video only shows the three of us. (for fictional reading only)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
e she said/he said, which means nothing every will be proven. Now, I give the Dems great respect for playing the game so well. They simply are better politicians than the Republicans. A desperate attempt by the Democrats to sway one or two republican votes.
What will be interesting to see is which Republican Senator decides to really cross-examine Ford, if any. I have this feeling, though, some still unknown background information on Ford will make its way into the media before Monday, making it easier for those on the fence to fall to Kavanaugh.
The Dems play the game better, are better politicians, Oh Brother, give me a break. GOP blocked a highly qualified candidate, Hatch and GOP vetters said Garland was super, "can we get nine more like him" and blocked him for an entire year for strictly political purposes. To hell with the country and a great justice, we put the party first.
One year block without even meeting with the man. McJowls and his cronies are lower than USC in my book and that's saying something.
(no message)
down, covered her mouth to prevent screams, had his buddy close/lock the door...
That's alot more than 'groping' and the young man would have to answer for it, to the law and/or to me.
And the outcome would not land him on the Supreme Court.
My now 23 year old daughter had an interesting take.
She was vet of more than a couple of private catholic HS parties.
She said that the only 15 year olds going to senior parties were those looking for trouble. There’s a heirarchy at those places and that rarely happens.
this matter.
Re: your daughter's observation, more information is required.
We have no idea yet whether this was an all-school party, or nearby Dr Blasey's home.
Or whether Dr Blasey was a Soph and most of the guys were Juniors or Seniors, which
is a frequent case.
The only 15 year old girls going to parties with all Jr and Sr boys were the fast crowd. It wasn’t common for most 15 year old girls.
The ones for their own group were bad enough, trust me. I bailed she and da friends out a few times.
I guess women can be tough on other women. She’s generally pretty feminist in her views though.
seem to indicate that the assailant knew what he doing was against her will, and wrong.
(no message)
(no message)
too, how a 15 year old girl running around in a bikini and drunk gets to said party and returns from said party without her parents' knowledge or curiosity and with no friends to confirm her attendance. It just doesn't pass the sniff test to me.
(no message)
(no message)
There is no way she can establish this.
Still, if I were betting, I think sumphin happened.
To raise it now though when it can’t ever be proven is just wrong.
(no message)
(no message)
But then so are those who accused Bill Clinton
But this much is clear: the dems are playing politics with this just like the reps did with the Clinton "bimbo eruptions". That said, one story about a high school drinking party isn't nearly as damning as the Clinton stuff. The timing shows it as a desperate attempt to delay the inevitable.
The idea that "all accusers should be believed" is just as silly as the opposite. We have due process and such in our criminal justice system, I like to think that it works most of the time.
The due process is when the Dems ask the FBI to vet her and those associated with her accusation before anyone can make a decision (this means the R's allow for the process to take place prior to the vote) on belief is probably a good idea where the Duke sports team and accuser didn't get much vetting before they were dragged down and vilified on a national stage.
This way, congress can have a clear mind in their votes to seat or not seat Kavanaugh.
And this isn't new evidence.
I get that the Dems are butthurt about the Garland thing and I would be too. But elections have consequences, as they always have. If the Dems controlled the Senate we'd have 2 vacancies, cause politicians play politics.
(no message)
(no message)
The odds are - just based on the long history of rape and sexual assault - that she is telling the truth. Sure, sometimes rape accusations are made up. But that is a small minority of cases.
But I am not comfortable with the notion that behavior as a kid - a drunk kid - is indicative of who this man is now. I am also not comfortable with the notion that a he-said/she-said situation from 35+ years ago can disqualify a nominee. If this was just one mistake by a kid, then it is different from a pattern of abuse.
So far, it's just this one mistake by a kid, maybe egged on by drunk idiot friends. He's not Trump, who groped and raped his way to the White House.
We can never establish the truth here.
To bring it up 35 years later to derail the nomination is wrong.
Congresswoman when she heard who Donny's douche bag's choices were. It took this long to get to where we are today mostly due to her not wanting to be so visible (I can't imagine why she'd think that) - possibly some political wrangling with the timing but I don't see this outcome of being exposed was her intent at the beginning.
Could she be telling the whole unvarnished truth, meebe but I doubt it. Same with Brett.
Also, it’s not like the guy was raping and woman assaulting his way to office like Orange. A one off serious incident of attempted rape which is what she is saying is rare for a true women assaulter. Drunken groping that the kid tries to push, that’s another story and my guess what really happened here. I also doubt she is upstairs after only one beer.
If there’s more I’ll listen. Don’t see it now though.
much more politically motivated than truth motivated. And, why the lie detector test? Who asked for that? I'm guessing when she went to the dems she either assumed everything would remain confidential or she was fully on board with the plan. Who in the hell wants to invite such scrutiny to his or her life knowing full well nothing can really be proven.
I doubt there are many who would like to be judged based on their behavior at drinking parties in high school (or even college).
(no message)
She was sober enough to remember the incident. He was drunk enough to forget it ever happened.
Given that there hasn't been a cavalcade of other accusers this strikes me as a one-off indiscretion of a way too drunk teenage boy.
Her’s was to tell no one about it for thirty years even while the guy is working in the Special Counsel’s Office, WH, and then nominated for the Court of Appeals.
To bring it up now, when nothing can be proven definitively to derail this guy is just wrong.