White House spokesperson Kerri Kupec said of those who allegedly attended the party, "One week ago, Dr. Christine Ford claimed she was assaulted at a house party attended by four others. Since then, all four of these individuals have provided statements to the Senate Judiciary Committee denying any knowledge of the incident or even having attended such a party."
Link: https://www-m.cnn.com/2018/09/22/politics/kavanaugh-ford-accuser-nomination/index.html?r=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F
(no message)
Katz is right, her account doesn’t prove that it didn’t happen.
However, it’s proof that no one can ascertain to a degree of reasonable certainty if something did happen, and if so what.
The accusers lawyer, almost assuredly hired by some D group, and the D’s themselves know this but have pursued it anyway.
(no message)
(no message)
If someone does before the vote, it needs to be looked into and considered.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
No one.
Link: https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/third-named-witness-rejects-kavanaughs-accusers-allegations/
...its goal? Thanks to Grassley so far, who thinks that he will somehow get the MSM to report that he bent over backwards to be fair, the answer is yes.
(no message)
(no message)