Democrats get 5 minutes apiece to ask questions.
Only a lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court.
Hurry. Hurry. Hurry.
Less information to consider is more.
Aim high, GOP!
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Right around the same time as the Palm Beach alleged rape.
(no message)
balls to question someone at all about jokes concerning a porno movie was pretty amazing.
(no message)
They cannot win. But you desperately want to believe these bullshit allegations are true despite the complete lack of any evidence.
You would think a person who spent their life in the legal system would have a bit more of an open mind.
(no message)
That's Ford's attorney walking behind Queen Mu-Mu for those that don't know.
(no message)
Would Mitch McConnell be preaching that the nominee deserves a floor vote? On the Senate Floor? That “we do our jobs?”
If the dems don't watch out and continue to mess around with the Kav nomination, the next candidate may frighten them more. They may win the house (though I seriously doubt it), but I don't think there is a path to take the majority in the senate. So, if Kav doesn't get an up or down vote, the pubs should get the c-o-jones to go further right with the next one.
(no message)
(no message)
Were you prepared to impeach him? Did you show this much disdain?
(no message)
(no message)
...mostly because he realized that Hillarycare was going to destroy his presidency, and he walked away from it.
Were you old enough to vote in '92 and '96? If so, for whom did you vote?
(no message)
Just spitballing here...
And if they were stalling, you would criticize them for not wanting to hear her story.
This is all fascinating to watch.
They long ago abandoned any pretense of serving anyone but the Corporate and social elite.
Ever Uber lib I know is an elitist fucking snob
I am guessing you are too based on your pompous arrogance
You never answered my question. Did you graduate from ND and when?
Here is the counterargument to yours, regarding the Dems:
In the words of Matt Walsh: "This is all about killing babies. Remember that. Democrats are furious that Kavanaugh might prevent them from killing babies. If Kavanaugh was in favor of killing babies, they wouldn't care if he was a serial rapist. The Democrat Party is truly the Devil's own party. Pure evil."
And: "If Kavanaugh was pro-abortion, they wouldn't care if he, say, raped a woman in an Arkansas hotel room, or drove a woman over a bridge and left her to die."
Who is being more reasonable? Walsh? Or you, the guy who says democracy is being strangled, but who supports a party who fixed their own party's election, and now are trying to nullify another by having bureaucrats use their purchased opposition research as a basis for an investigation to take down an elected president.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
It’s simbolic for the GOP
(no message)