God knows what it will be.
Here is the nightmare scenario (for this country, I mean):
1) Whatever this is raises the heat on the moderate GOP members, and Kavanaugh's nomination falls through;
2) There isn't time to nominate and hold hearings for a new person, especially since one-third of the Senate will need to be home campaigning;
3) The Democrats win the Senate;
4) The GOP calls a special session and tries to get a nominee through with a lame-duck majority.
That is the recipe for abject chaos, and a de-legitimized SCOTUS.
A nightmare.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
That's quite a coincidence.
(no message)
after seeing trains of boys lined up to gang rape other girls on numerous occasions. It got to the point that she avoided the punch at the parties.
Mueller finally does something?
Probably not covered on Fox, but Mueller had indicted Manafort, Cohen, PapaD, scores of Russians, and lots of others.
Try to keep up.
I dont see Trump on that list.....after two years
(no message)
Unless Trump loses, in which case he will just pardon himself on the way out the door. He'd be a fool not to do that, even if he is 100% innocent.
(no message)
You don't want the Right to join them, and I get that. You want to take the high road. That is admirable.
I just can't get too upset about the playing field being leveled.
And, it is fun to watch conor get upset about the playing field being level. He fears not having the advantage of a liberal activist court. I get that, too. But he can't fairly oppose a legitimate shift in polarization, just like you and he can't fairly oppose a legitimate election.
I dislike a liberal activist court almost as much as you.
I would also vote to confirm if that were held right now. I just don’t buy the holier than thou choir boy bullshit of this guy.
Some of your cohorts here though are much more scary.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Change your support for Trumpo or let us know your excuse /justification for this criminal behavior
They were indicted for tangental crap. In fact, Manafort was indicted for FARA violations that Podesta (D-uncharged) also commited.
Going back years to come up with some bullshit tax evasion or money laundering crap would make me support him more. Hillary can lie about deleting 30,000 yoga emails, destroy govt property, ignore subpoenas, and rake in money from Russians, but Trump goes down? Please.
Are you part of the Russian mafia? Trolling this site and others.
(no message)
(no message)
and also went to a prep school should not sit on the Supreme Court.
investigation.
You are the epitome of a partisan hypocrite.
(no message)
drinking to much in prep school? Idjit.
(no message)
I think that a blind squirrel (Avenatti) finding the nut is unlikely. But stranger things have happened.
The sheer volume of research into Kavanaugh's past that must have been done by now with nothing turned up in the last 30 years is a strong indicator to me.
I wonder if they did that for Sotomayor.
Also being reported that Facebook banned a user for posting the audio. Don't know if true. Again, I wonder if Facebook would do this if this were an Obama nominee.
Interesting that Google or his internet provider hasn't leaked search histories or surf histories.
The GOP is very naive when it comes to this stuff. They could have dug out a bunch of stuff (it apparently doesn't have to be supported by any evidence), but they took the high road instead. I assume they've learned their lesson??? Granted, they don't have an entire network and alliance of internet companies to do that for them. Maybe they can get FoxNews to do it for them next go-round.
How about finding out whether or not the story is true first, then post.
PS: there is nothing about the GOP that is naïve when it comes to dirty tricks. Lets just start with Nixon as an obvious.
(no message)
are usually backed up with facts and the ability to justify the claim.
You, you just posted anything you wanted and used FB as a back up. Sounds like you're making stuff up or are gullible to gossip on FB.
(no message)
The point was you painting D's as tricksters and the GOP naïve when it comes to using tricks.
It's so like you and many here to post bullshit like that. Your trick to confuse the facts. The GOP is accustomed to using tricks.
So your fake shit is, fake -
Trumpian in fact.
The rest of your post is hilariously funny given who is posting it.
foreign govt.
And, Roger Stone is such a babe in the woods. Like Lee Atwater was.
Partisans are all the same.
(no message)
(no message)
You really just called someone tiresome? That is fucking comical
Not that he assaulted anyone. But that he was a misogynistic HS kid who behaved badly toward women when drinking which was a lot who then cleaned up his act? Entirely possible. St. Augustine, anyone?
One wonders when that will be enough to block a nominee.
(no message)
Some cities have very many private high schools, and the Jesuit schools do not always cater to rich kids only. I thought he went to a Jesuit high school.
I went to a "college prep" school. One kid, from a wealthy family, drove a Mercedes coup to school every day, so people could have called us a rich school. But I drove a 10 year old station wagon, and before a party one time, I picked up a friend in a very poor part of town...poor enough to make me wonder what I'd gotten into in agreeing to pick him up...if his house had 2 bedrooms, I don't know how they fit it in. Anyway, we had a true cross section of the population, regardless of our stereotype.
(no message)
(no message)
I’m going by what it’s own alumni say about the place back then.
I do find it disconcerting though that even the latest accusation does not even talk about Kavanaugh doing anything directly. Just that he participated in getting girls drunk at parties.
girls drunk at parties.'
She flat out says, he took out his junk and stuck it in her face, close enough it almost touched her and by pushing him away, she had to touch it to do so. What about that just says / Just that he participated in getting girls drunk at parties... and didn't do anything directly"?
But thanks for trying.
Do tell.
PS: she did identify him directly and by two different ways.
Thanks for playing.
I'll post this article for a 3rd time. They could both be telling the truth. She could be telling the truth that she believes in what she remembers and he could be telling the truth that he doesn't remember it at all. Neither is a strong indication of what really did or didn't happen. Corroboration would be helpful in figuring out what really happened, so far there isn't any.
Link: https://apnews.com/4bbe9c74f889442fa969690732e5cc59
I knew a guy who was a very confident liar. Everything was always black and white to that guy, and he acted like any idiot could tell he was right...he was that way all the time, about all things--pure confidence. It was tedious. I knew from prior dealings with him to probe very deeply before relying on anything he said.
Anyway, the company was approaching a trial, so they ran a test trial with a test jury, and the company won (of course). Polling afterward indicated that the verdict hung on that guy's testimony. The jury loved him. The guy who I knew to be the least trustworthy witness was considered by the jury to be far-and-away the most trustworthy witness. They loved his quick answers and "any idiot knows" attitude, and they discounted the thoughtful witnesses who knew that the key issues were nuanced.
That was damned depressing.
Personal opinion is something did, but not sure of the assault claim.
Either way it isn’t proveable.
My Lord!
Stop making a fool of yourself.
(no message)
President.
Comical
(no message)
His choir boy BS blanket denials are doing him in.
All he needs to say is yeah I drank a lot back then and may have done some stupid shit that wasn’t real respectful of the other gender when I wasn’t yet an adult. That’s not me now and I have a 30 year record to prove it. I know I never assaulted anyone. This is a political set up.
But, instead we get I was a virgin, I always treated women with respect, I never got black out drunk. Those are lies if you read his yearbook profile.
For what it’s worth I want him to be confirmed. He’s making it hard though.
He said that on national TV.
Maybe it is a lie, though. Who knows. Doesn't matter. Nominations can't be stopped by unsupportable allegations 35 years after the fact when even the alleged victims admit they didn't remember the "facts" until Kavanaugh rose to prominence.
Lies now though are also directly relevant. He’s gonna step in shit.
He has said for example that he has always been respectful of women. You think that jibes with his yearbook profile?
I haven't read his profile. I can't imagine how it matters. Sounds like he might have been a dick. Some of those types of guys from high school turned out to be very nice guys if my latest reunion is any indication.
Even if you don’t, you can see he was a normal HS misogynist of the early 80’s.
Just quit the choir boy routine, it’s insulting.
(no message)
(no message)
He has portrayed himself has a choir boy.
Clearly, we all mature in life, and our stupid years are generally age 15- 21 .
He easily could have had a Come to Jesus moment in his early adulthood, and has flown straight since, leading an honorable and charitable life. Good husband. Good father. Good neighbor.
But, he does not get a free pass to be untruthful, merely because he knows he will be an excellent jurist on our highest court.
Putting on my prosecutor hat, it is rare that 3 women who don't know each other, all decide to fabricate their claims, and are willing to go under oath and lie, .... above and beyond letting their personal lives come under public scrutiny.
Candor please.
I didn’t have an a eighth of that dudes profile, but who the hell didn’t drink way to much and try to get around the basepaths back then?
But you didn’t force it or assault anyone.
But this virgin who always respected womens is a flat out lie.
That would be me.
I was deathly afraid of women in high school and college and as a result never had a girlfriend. And drinking? Only Coke and Pepsi for me.
So if any woman wants to claim anything about me, I was probably the most boring college student in history.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
You think that respectful of women and sober chacterizes Brett in HS?
Blessed with a terrific Guardian Angel.
Would never represent that I was a choir boy. Kavanaugh did.
(no message)
(no message)
You know how this works.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Also, rumors are rampant that his third accuser was a prank to troll him. I would laugh for a good week if it turns out to be true.
about pee-pee tapes. Take Avenatti out of the picture and fucktard Donald’s life gets a whole lot easier.
You likely have posted the most stupid comment in UHND history. Seriously, is you’re thinking that severely impaired? The guy is sleazy but has been undeniably accurate beyond question.
(no message)
(no message)
I’m still looking through Capone’s vault.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
I guess it all depends on the assumptions you make. You assume Kavanaugh is a scumbag, so the accusations ring true. I don't know anything about Kavanaugh, so I just evaluate the accusations, and they seem to be politically motivated and are so unsupportable by any objective, non-partisan testimony that they must be ignored.
That’s the $64K issue.
Everything else is just noise.
they would like to confirm a conservative.
(no message)
There was no diversion. You made point X. I made point not-X, and then pointed out that it all comes down to one's assumptions and conclusions, as there is not a bit of evidence to force a conclusion one way or the other.
I think a tie goes to the accused.
You think a tie goes to the Democrat.
We just come from different angles on this.
...and determine that they are all full of shit.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)