(did so just before the election in 2016 because of pressure from Republicans)
but not okay to publish notes on Kavanaugh's interviews in wake of hearings on Kavanaugh's seating.
FBI director is a Yale law grad contemporary to Kavanaugh, and Rosenstein worked with Kavanaugh in Starr probe of Clinton.
Hmmmmmm!
Easy explanation.
Designer mu-mus can't be bought in just any store, you know.
(no message)
against the R's and their plight, and yet there is clearly circumstantial proof to the contrary.
Okay, I'll go on record.
after the recent NYT article and his upcoming meeting with Trump about how he may have suggested wiring himself to get him removed as unfit.
Many of the DeepState's heads have been removed (Brennan, McCabe, Comey, Strzok, etc) and those that are left have gone to ground for cover.
I do hope that Trump is placing his own people in the DOJ and FBI though - we will play by your rules now.
Maybe Orange can come up with some catchy new acronym like he did for NAFTA.
Hope that you will be forever happy with 100 keg virgin Brett.
your Vag is producing too many stories, even you are starting to believe in them along with Neddie, Cole, Iggles, CC72 and Westcoast whom now are all wedded to them as your backup.
(no message)
(no message)
Or are Deep Staters just those people in government that still care about the rule of law?
For example: "Jon Liberal. Native of San Francisco. Undergraduate degree from Oberlin College, where he majored in Great Society prorams. Masters degree in Climate Science from Cal Berkeley. Joined the Environmental Protection Agency after 4 years with the Peace Corps in Haiti. In his spare time Jon works at homeless shelters and at a free health clinic in southwestern Virginia. Lists Madam Secretary and Stephen Colbert as his favorite TV shows. Person that he would like to be for one day: Lawrence O'Donnell. Quote: "Government service is an honor. I'm glad to be making a difference".
...but they are a good start. The FISA applications will soon be another document available for you to peruse.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fotKK5kcMOg
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
To Lance. Not you.
Rooney's pretty angry...for a Canadian.
(no message)
I am not sure whether FBI case notes should be in the public domain or not, but consistency (tradition/precedent) is important. Comey clearly didn't follow established procedures (or whatever language the AG report used). So thusly, the HRC email issue failures aren't an example to be followed.
Words from Donny Douchebag himself. He also made it a point, Rosenstein's memo on Comey's handling of the report prior to the 2016 elections had nothing to do with Comey's firing.
Can we not discuss the justification for firing Comey independent of speculation about why Donnie Douchebag (whose mind similarly works in mysterious ways) fired him?
My point had nothing to do with Trump, it was related to your original post which also had nothing to do with Trump. Why your mind goes straight to that in response to me in particular is weird. Weird because I didn't vote for him and don't support him. Truth is, I view you and Trump in the same light. Only real difference being that he managed to be elected president and you have accomplished, well...
For clarity: I AM SAYING THAT THE HILLARY EMAIL CASE WASN'T THE FBI'S FINEST HOUR. MAYBE NOT A STANDARD ALL FUTURE CASES SHOULD FOLLOW, YA KNOW, YOUR PREMISE?
Seeing Trump fired Comey, it has everything to do with TRUMP. - your words "Comey clearly didn't follow established procedures "
So, IYO - Comey was fired justifiably, somehow, not for the reasons you give.
I view you and Palin in the same light - STUPID!
And you've accomplished the same - you're annoying at best.
It was just, AKA he deserved it, FOR THE REASONS I CITED, NOT NECESSARILY THE REASONS USED.
Now, are you still thinking the FBI should act in the manner they did on the Hillary email debacle now and in the future?
Please
I had to do that on my phone.
(no message)
Good talk Jim, you fucking bore.
Blasey’s allegations whether you believe her or not are essentially unverifiable after 36 years.
My only question is whether they properly followed up on Ramirez who purportedly gave them a list of twenty witnesses to corroborate her claims.
(no message)
(no message)
N nor sexual assault.
(no message)
(no message)
the scope that they were limited to in this investigation.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_lie
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)