(no message)
not to trust them. Furthermore, you are making a mountain of a molehill, by virtue of the fact that I am unaware and uninterested in your hysterical claims about this venerable news organization.
What's next from you? Hysterical claims about Antifa, about which I know nothing? That right-wing boogeyman (or, as Chris prefers, "bogeyman) that unsophisticated hicks like yourself trot out to deflect attention from the white supremacists at Charlottesville and Ferguson?
If you need to be outraged about someone or something, the Internet will help. Then post some obscure blog here and ask why we are not all outraged by it. Because anything short of that is lack of intellectual curiosity.
(no message)
What does the article say and how exactly should it affect our trust in NBC?
Not a long piece.
NBC has a history of timing the release of stories to suit a political bias, especially stories involving sexual misconduct. Examples:
1. They knew that the Swetnick/Avenatti story was bullshit, but withheld that information until now.
2. Sitting on the Juanita Broaddrick interview until after the Senate trial.
3. Declining to run Ronan Farrow's report on Harvey Weinstein.
You are often critical of Fox News media bias here (as am I), so your lack of interest in this makes you seem pretty intellectually dishonest. Fox News and all of the right wing media sites exist because NBC and others have failed to live up to their 1st amendment duties. Really not sure where a person is supposed to go to get unbiased reporting of the news and I find that frustrating personally, but it's pretty clear it isn't NBC.
No. They are clowns, and I don't bother. Now, I definitely am critical of people that parrot their shit. There are legions of posters that seem to get nearly all of the talking points and spin from Fox. It's them that I tend to mock. They have deluded themselves.
The difference is that I never quote NBC News. I don't know anyone here who does. No one here has deluded themselves into thinking every spin that comes out of NBC's sewer is gospel truth. I'm not even sure they even do that. So what is the point of convincing people not to trust a specific network that no one seems to pay attention to?
In a matter of 3 posts you've gone from attacking the source to "tell me what it says" to "no one watches NBC news", which is a fact is easily disputable as the NBC nightly news is often ranked #1 in it's time slot. Twisted up much?
If I read your article, then I will be obligated to rip your thesis to shreds. Then you will have a bad day, and I would not wish that upon you, kind sir.
(no message)
Releasing it only after Kavanaugh was confirmed and now that Avenatti-bashing is fashionable by both sides.
That is helpful.
That chick that testified admitted Kavanaugh never touched her?
The alleged 3rd chick who said he spiked the punch at parties. She disavowed the statement and called Avenatti a liar. She has walked various statements back.
(no message)
(no message)
No prevarications? I mean.....really.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
anyone who disagrees with me...they're all synonymous!
Uninformed and blissfully so. Stay blessed.
(no message)
(no message)
The MSM has dropped all pretenses now. They have come out of the closet as tools of the Dem Party.
I've not seen it.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)