I know a fair number of you psychos don’t see what the fuss is here, but CNN has jumped the shark yet again.
Link: https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/cnn-slammed-for-trashing-trumps-visit-to-troops-criticizing-soldiers-for-bringing-maga-hats
However there are legions of photos of soldiers asking Obama for his autograph too. CNN didn't run stories then (nor should they have). These people can't win arguments and are simply authoritarians who are motivated by one thing: TDS.
Link: https://twitter.com/BFriedmanDC/status/1078423533955567618?s=19
You owned us all on that one.
But rather the MAGA hats.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
You have an Alpha King and and Two Hearted in front of you.
Which do you open first?
(no message)
(no message)
Haven’t tried either one, but I would have to start with the cooler name.
People I know speak very highly of Two Hearted, but I'll take Founder's All Day...well...all day.
To meet him and you halfway. Why does he need to attack half or more of Americans in front of the troops? What about the talk about the pay raises? Is CNN misreporting that as well? Wouldn’t accurate reporting be somewhere between Fox and CNN? And what about the ungrateful Iraqi leadership? Why do they want to kick us out? We have been propping them up for 17 years. I don’t get their hostility toward Trumps visit or our Troops being there?
He was offering and signing campaign souvenirs for those troops that wanted them. That is not attacking anyone.
Presidents have been actively campaigning while in office for centuries, and Obama even did it for his chosen successor. Big deal.
The TDS is the MSM 1) feeling attacked for what they would normally not even take notice because it is Trump, and 2) going to the unbelievably ridiculous level of accusing a legal violation.
Maybe we should add this to Mueller’s list?
You have not listened to the talk that included his political agenda and listed the Dems as bad. And what about him saying the troops have not gotten a raise for ten years and now he got them a raise for 10%. Everything I read says this is not true in either respect. I read a Fox transcript and all they talked about was the hat shit. I fault CNN for making a big deal out of that and I fault Fox for glossing over the bigger part of the story. And I still don’t get the Iraqi response.
....I did not hear the speech. Perhaps you are right about that. But I was posting on CNN’s response to the hats - apparently we agree that it was over the top.
When a news organization has such an extreme case of TDS that they continuously find fault and doom in Trumps every action, it takes away their credibility when they actually have a fair point to make.
The same thing goes with the name calling in posts here - though it doesn’t bother me, it FOeS discredit the posters credibility.