There's something about a harridan that turns off male voters.
Link: https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/01/elizabeth-warren-unpopular-it-depends-who-you-ask/579247/
That's how Hillary lost...per Hillary.
First is was John Kerry with his staged hunting trip - 'I'm here to get me a hunting license'. Now we have the Warren launching this tripe 'I'm gonna get me a beer'.
Desperate PR moves by people who are completely out of touch.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
The professor has me marked as a KKK member. Although, and you may know this already, apparently white supremacists have a soft spot in their hearts for American Indians, whom they see as "pure."
Link: https://www.npr.org/2012/04/20/151037079/the-artful-reinvention-of-klansman-asa-earl-carter
I'd recommend Sam Harris' interview of Deeyah Kahn though. An interesting expose of the "Nazis".
the overarching point that getting to know your "enemy" humanizes them is obviously true. This is, of course, why the current leftist response is not simply ineffective, but moves more towards the supremacist camp. Their response to the people who believe Group A is inherently defective is to label the folks who believe that inherently defective.
along with Antifa being counterproductive was quite convincing, at least to me.
"ordinary" supremacist friends. The humanization bit goes both ways. Look, Richard Spencer is an evil, demonic human being, but my guess is that if she spent more time talking with Taylor, she'd look at him much the same way she looked at the supremacists she ended up befriending.Is Taylor fundamentally different than the supremacists she befriended? Posibbly. Maybe he's less sincere, too. My guess though, is that the reason he's on TV and they weren't is not due to any of that, just the fact that he's more educated, more articulate and thus makes for a better interview both for the mainstream press and for the supremacist/separatist media sites.