I have said all along that if the Trump campaign shared GOP polling data and voter info research with Russian intelligence, then they do not deserve to be in the White House.
Some of you on the right have agreed with me in the past. I wonder if you will when the shit hits the fan in coming months.
Link: https://twitter.com/jonswaine/status/1082707274232221696
(no message)
Bobby Three Sticks seems to be a ways down the road to proving it.
(no message)
about polling data, unless the Russians were helping the campaign and it was germane to that help.
No one ever did confirm it. It was just more BS from the media trying to smear Trump. Your post is more of the same.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
If it is true that the Trump campaign shared GOP voter info with Russian intel so that Moscow could target misinformation more efficiently, would that cross the impeachable-offense line for you?
Put aside everything else for a minute. If that is true, and you were in the Senate, how would you vote?
Godfather when they wanted to sell drugs only to the "coloreds". I don't think colluding is somehow trying to get people to think one way. It may not be ethical but how do you control and what do you control these days? Sad. but true. I think physically changing the computers so that the votes are misplaced or miscalculated intentionally is colluding.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
The tweet says "polling data." Are you kidding me that "polling data", which could be as simple as approval ratings, is top-secret/treasonous-to-share stuff?
You hate Trump. It affects your thinking. You are not alone.
Get your facts right.
The accusation has been out there about voter research for a while. It might be false.
It might not.
Would it be impeachable?
- you say voter info, the tweet says polling data
- the tweet says that the Russian who received the data may have ties to Russian intel, but he may not. Who knows?
- what gain was there? why did it happen? what proof is there of said alleged gain?
- The Trump Campaign is not Trump for criminal or impeachment purposes. Campaigns do a lot of shit. Candidates do not. If Candidates got indicted for every campaign violation, then Obama and Hillary would have prison cells.
Just stop.
Even if they were just sharing polling data about who to target it’s still traitorous and criminal. I have never had an iota of doubt that this would be proven against the campaign and its members. I still though haven’t seen Orange tied to it directly.
Step up and answer it.
Chris couched the question as a hypothetical.
Let's say this is true. Just for fun!
(no message)
This tweet is not the issue. As we have said, this accusation has been central to the whole collusion case.
Of course you don't want to answer the question. It causes too much cognitive dissonance to even contemplate.
(no message)