(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Frankly, it’s the only part of the shutdown that will inconvenience me.
Airlines do not have an incentive to move people through faster. They have an incentive to make air travel safe.
You just assume that the private sector would be better...but it is a public good, which is normally better served by public services, like fire fighting or air traffic control. Or border protection.
Despite what many believe.
(no message)
(no message)
The only incentive airlines have is to move more passengers for profit.
You're not making much sense.
the airlines will need to pay to insure against any mistake their screening army makes? pay those extra dollars for our safety as it is put aside because airlines cut corners by hiring low cost incompetent agents trying to stay competitive with each other? Pay those extra dollars to keep people employed and flying after a few planes drop out of the sky because there weren't enough agents at the gates to check a backpack a McVeigh from Michigan brought on as his carry on?
I don't think you given this subject much thought.
My thought is to somehow streamline the TSA operation as it seems hugely cumbersome and inefficient. Domestically, there seems to be too many breeches in security with some able to pass through the agenting without detection of their fire-arms.
(no message)
(no message)
It. Talk about alternate universe.
How is that, "typical liberal"?
Is that why you want it to privatized?
You're not making a whole lot a sense there.
(no message)
You're not thinking it all the way through. Kind of knee-jerking a response
(no message)