Conservative media can't help themselves but to give her all the oxygen she needs while ignoring the real candidates. It'd be even better if she actually ran. She'd get creamed in the primary but Fox would be 24/7 Clinton.
(no message)
(no message)
All of the potential candidates have infrastructure in place; she has none.
Don’t worry.
If she did decide to run, it wouldn't take too long for her to field a team. She's been there and has tons of good will.
Like Slick, I think she does come with a certain amount of kryptonite. She could only do this if she were willing to be less of a diplomat and go to the mat with Trump and any other candidate - something she just won't do - that's not who she is.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
And that is as important to Putin as anything. It has never been more obvious that atrump was not in bed with Putin, but nonetheless, your delusion is so ingrained that you are actually willing to support the guy with whom you attack Trump for supposedly colluding.
This proves you and most of the Left simply hate Trump. Pure and simple. Why? Because he beat you. He broke you.
I haven't said anything other than - Socialism didn't cause the crisis in Venezuela.
Whatever it is you keep posting is of some fantastical wishing made of your own delusions.
Hate Trump? Really? You get that?
Well, Hate maybe a bit strong, but dislike in every facet of life? - yes.
He's what is abhorrent in behavior and in life. He's what you hope never to have on the bottom of your shoe when entering your own home.
And that you are the poster-child of a Trump Supporter should be most worrisome to you because now, anything you say and do for life is untrustworthy.
(no message)
False narrative for their minions.
(no message)
The dimwits who championed Hillary helped beget Trump.
How about while Secretary of State? Did she sell some political influence there? If so, how about some proof.
Why? it was doing such good work. Why did other countries stop donating after her loss?
Why are Bill's speaking engagements down.
Secretary of State? Her Senatorship? (Listening tour anybody?) Those were gifts...payoffs for "standing by her man" and not tearing the party asunder...and to give her gravitas to try and get elected purely by virtue of the existence of her vagina.
Though I like neither...she got what she deserved thankfully from both Obama and Trump...
No need to waste time on this. You're throwing her over for Kamala anyway...let's be honest...
(no message)
(no message)
If one allegation is proven false, they all must be false. Well done HillBot.
Rage on
(no message)
we can all talk about and as we all know, presidents do parlay their years in WH into future income, but proven or proved - it's just not there. So why use it as a point of defamation?
I used Uranium 1 as a comparison to another allegation of HRC - valid because it's just what you R's do. An example of falsehoods - HRC is not physically fit for office - you all played that card for months - it was untrue - Benghazi, how many hearings on that, that proved untrue and a enormous falsehood. So you see, there's plenty of grist for that comparison mill when you make those points.
(no message)
"Lock her up" was the call and yet Flynn, Manafort, Papadopoulos, Gates, Richard Pinedo, Alex van der Zwaan, Konstantin Kilimnik, Roger Stone, Michael Cohen and many more associated with the Trump team, and soon to be others all by actually connecting the dots.
Trump called HRC was in bed with the Russians and yet, here we are on the verge of finding out Trump himself along with this family are those persons who are in bed with the Russians.
It's funny how this all works - When a Republican calls a Democrat a liar or a thief or any other noun - you can lay money that it is they who are guilty of that very thing.
Just a reminder:
Goal was to install Bill in the West Wing as First Gentle(bag)man and finish collecting the rest of their cool billion through the built-in money laundering vehicle of speaking fees. I commend them on the plan. It works. They reaped a quarter billion courtesy of Ross Perot lifting their grifting asses high enough to get into the white house. Bill, though a scumbag, was at least a consummate politician. Hillary exists as a candidate because of the deal cut to save Bill's ass...
They came This Close too...
Can see it frosts you as the dutiful little Hillbot you are...
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
...Huma.
She at least has a paying position and is in on the scam...
(no message)
You actually use it here and I've never been a defender of Trump...but you can't help yourself.
However, the Clintons are a Government for Profit entity...whether you choose to acknowledge it or not...
He's literally too stupid to realize how bad he's losing.
She was an abysmal candidate, and also a cheater.
For President or Senator.
And I never will.
(no message)
(no message)
It's pure defense of a sense of "identity" that matters to most.
Celebrities and nepotism -
and most certainly - Trump who had and still has, zero qualifications.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
To put this "most qualified" hogwash in perspective, she served eight years as a senator and she'd been the chairman of the Children's Defense Fund, along with being a First Lady. We can rattle of winning and losing candidates in most elections before she ran and find more qualified candidates Kerry, the Bushes, Gore, Dukakis, Mondale, Reagan, Carter, Ford...all far more qualified, having been vice presidents and/or governors, among other, more impressive resumes. Yes, she was more qualified than a reality TV star. This is called "damning with faint praise."
(no message)
that would put into perspective, qualified.
I dig how being Governor of a State is up there in your "most qualified" over someone like HRC (of which she was not just first lady, she was first lady for 8 years and was politically active her entire adult life) who was a Governors wife as well. When Bill Clinton was running for POTUS, he was called unqualified for the oval office because he was only a Governor of a state.
But back to qualified - what is your issue with her having the resume she has?
I make a point of the importance of being a chief executive prior to serving as president and your response is to somehow connect me to people who criticized Bill for having "only" been a chief executive of a state. It gets frustrating to have arguments with people who don't understand how to make intelligent arguments.
I don't think being the spouse of a politician, regardless the length of time, is a qualification to be president. You apparently do.
Her resume has nothing else on it. Genius.
Did you miss that? See what I mean about arguing with people who don't understand how to intelligently argue? I can literally quote from my initial response and I would still have to make three laps around the park with you before you'll finally realize that and then switch to the next logical fallacy.
implying my post explicitly says that when it doesn't - how man laps for you to get it right?
Guess I had it wrong.
(no message)
Vague assertions flow from his mouth, and when people ask for clarification or call him on his stupidity, he just pretends that everyone else is stupid. I firmly think he believes he is schooling the entire board...all the while he is the single biggest drag on this board.
(no message)
Mind-numbing.
(no message)
I would argue, "quite likely."
(no message)
She's as damaged as she is qualified.
(no message)
(no message)