What the hell? Is the Virginia Governor advocating for infanticide?
Link: https://twitter.com/CalebJHull/status/1090657473218920448?s=19
(no message)
of days before a powerful "moderate" Democrat went full stupid and made it happen.
I'm sure this is happening all the time, which is why we are discussing it, right? I mean, there is no way that right-wing websites you love would pump up a bullshit hypothetical just to whip up the faithful, right?
....first the part you know and don’t care - the taking of viable life - viable outside the womb, because the woman wants to end the life of the baby rather than adopt.
....here’s the part that you don’t know.....
This is an incredibly dangerous procedure that no doctor in their right mind would perform. It has no medical indications and is a extremely high risk to the woman due risk of bleeding, infection, uterine perforation, uterine rupture and of course, death.
....and here’s what else you don’t know. Cupmo’s law in NY allows NON DOCTOR’S to perform this dangerous procedure - because they cannot find educated and skilled people - even pro abortion ones - in any numbers to perform the ghoulish and dangerous procedures.
....here’s something else that you don’t know....the procedure is so dangerous that the far safer option to you pro abortion people is to allow the birth first and then just kill the baby. When this is legal, that is the rout that these Planned Parenthood nurse practitioners will take.
You ought to start caring, but I doubt that you will.
Or - as I suspect - unbelievably, vanishingly rare?
(no message)
Ask a stupid question....
(no message)
...and the rarity of it shouldn’t matter, the fact it is being allowed is.
What is rare can become common. One life deserves protection as well.
The procedure probably adds up to about the 1000/yr range in legitimate settings, but there is no way to know since there are not reliable records on this.
Finally, if it were incredibly rare , and since there is no case where the procedure is the safest option for the woman, why would you ever then make it legal at all?
The answer lies in the “born alive” clause as I pointed out in my post above.
Life is determined by a baby mama. End of discussion.
(no message)