Chris, Frank, Conor, ND5467997653, what do you make of Senator Burr's

Author: Cole (7342 Posts - Joined: Oct 15, 2012)

Posted at 8:28 am on Feb 8, 2019

investigation where he interviewed 200-plus Witnesses and reviewed 300,000 documents, including all of the classified intelligence reports, and did not find any evidence whatsoever that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia?

Replies to: Chris, Frank, Conor, ND5467997653, what do you make of Senator Burr's


Thread Level: 2

I don’t give two craps about what any partisan Dem or Republican member of Congress says

Author: CC72 (13747 Posts - Joined: Sep 5, 2010)

Posted at 1:59 pm on Feb 8, 2019

They are all lying scum power-hungry useless hacks.

Thread Level: 3

I think you've got something there.

Author: Rooster (2589 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 2:16 pm on Feb 8, 2019

(no message)

Thread Level: 2

Did you just post someone's personal phone number?

Author: LehighND (4618 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 1:46 pm on Feb 8, 2019

Or do we have a new poster?

Thread Level: 3

He just recently changed his user name. Used to be: JENNY8675309

Author: TakethetrainKnute (15804 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 2:07 pm on Feb 8, 2019

(no message)

Thread Level: 4

He claims to be a good time.

Author: Frank L (32215 Posts - Joined: Sep 20, 2007)

Posted at 2:28 pm on Feb 8, 2019

(no message)

Thread Level: 2

Does the Manafort timeline seem like just a coincidence?

Author: conorlarkin (10023 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 12:59 pm on Feb 8, 2019
Thread Level: 2

The 5th sealed indictment filed was Jared ? Don Jr was in the first 4, right ? #TrumpTowerMeeting

Author: ND521 (2860 Posts - Joined: May 10, 2016)

Posted at 12:28 pm on Feb 8, 2019

(no message)

Thread Level: 2

Should find out if Senator Warner agrees.

Author: golfernot (934 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 12:27 pm on Feb 8, 2019

Guessing that he does not.

Thread Level: 2

Well, Holy Cow. Burr found no collusion. This is the same guy who went to the ATM machine everyday

Author: Rooster (2589 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 12:07 pm on Feb 8, 2019

in 2008 and withdrew the max because he said the entire financial industry is collapsing yet still voted against Dodd-Frank, feels the banking industry should have LESS regulation, was outraged when Wells Fargo was fined for opening accounts without customer's knowledge, "the fine is government over reach", of course was in favor of Citizens United, says climate change is not contributed to by people or industry, gets a A+ from NRA...and found no collusion-earthshaking.

This message has been edited 1 time(s).

Thread Level: 2

Please link Senate report and I will be glad to comment.

Author: conorlarkin (10023 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 11:09 am on Feb 8, 2019

(no message)

Thread Level: 2

I think you will find that the anti-Trump people here are ready to accept any findings

Author: Chris94 (20821 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 9:57 am on Feb 8, 2019

Unlike you, I trust our investigators and special counsels.

If Mueller tells us there was no collusion, then there was no collusion.

We shall see.


Thread Level: 3

Sure you trust the SC, you know it’s make up. But Schiff disagrees. He has set up a plan B

Author: BaronVonZemo (22583 Posts - Joined: Nov 19, 2010)

Posted at 10:19 am on Feb 8, 2019

With his congressional investigation which he specifically made a pint to say would operate regardless of Mueller findings.

Personally, I agree with you, I am also confident that Mueller will find what you want, or at least cast enough shade if he doesn’t. One cannot just forget the friendship with Comey, the texts of multiple team members, and the not only the past behavior of Andrew Weisman, but his involvement with Bruce Ohr in the Dossier development and use for the FISA warrant. And let’s not forget the leaks.
Beyond all of that, we have further reassurance that individuals on the team all gave money to the Dems in their personal life. Rest easy. You’ll get what you want while we won’t care what he finds.


This message has been edited 2 time(s).

Thread Level: 4

Not everyone sees this through partisan lenses, Baron. Hard to believe!

Author: Chris94 (20821 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 12:53 pm on Feb 8, 2019

(no message)

Thread Level: 3

I balee that those on the other side of the fence here have already said that.

Author: Frank L (32215 Posts - Joined: Sep 20, 2007)

Posted at 10:09 am on Feb 8, 2019

I don’t know if the report is going to make a specific finding on that subject though. If it does, then it will be accepted.

This message has been edited 1 time(s).

Thread Level: 2

We already know the campaign colluded with Russia. See Trump Tower and Paul Manafort.

Author: Frank L (32215 Posts - Joined: Sep 20, 2007)

Posted at 8:41 am on Feb 8, 2019

The only issue is the extent and whether it was criminal.

Thread Level: 3

So I guess you believe Burr is wrong. Got it.

Author: Cole (7342 Posts - Joined: Oct 15, 2012)

Posted at 9:44 am on Feb 8, 2019

(no message)

Thread Level: 4

Your brilliance keeps shining right through.

Author: Frank L (32215 Posts - Joined: Sep 20, 2007)

Posted at 9:57 am on Feb 8, 2019

(no message)

Thread Level: 5

Since you found collusion, I suppose you favor impeaching the motherfuker?

Author: Cole (7342 Posts - Joined: Oct 15, 2012)

Posted at 10:11 am on Feb 8, 2019

(no message)

Thread Level: 6

I didn’t find it, it’s obvious.

Author: Frank L (32215 Posts - Joined: Sep 20, 2007)

Posted at 10:31 am on Feb 8, 2019

The questions that are not yet answerable are whether it was criminal and whether Trump is personally implicated.

Sooooo, being rational, unlike you, I would withhold judgment on impeachment until we hear from Robert Mueller, the third of that name. Only if he presents clear and convincing evidence of a crime personally involving the Orange plague, would I be favor of impeachment.