investigation where he interviewed 200-plus Witnesses and reviewed 300,000 documents, including all of the classified intelligence reports, and did not find any evidence whatsoever that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia?
They are all lying scum power-hungry useless hacks.
(no message)
Or do we have a new poster?
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Guessing that he does not.
in 2008 and withdrew the max because he said the entire financial industry is collapsing yet still voted against Dodd-Frank, feels the banking industry should have LESS regulation, was outraged when Wells Fargo was fined for opening accounts without customer's knowledge, "the fine is government over reach", of course was in favor of Citizens United, says climate change is not contributed to by people or industry, gets a A+ from NRA...and found no collusion-earthshaking.
(no message)
Unlike you, I trust our investigators and special counsels.
If Mueller tells us there was no collusion, then there was no collusion.
We shall see.
With his congressional investigation which he specifically made a pint to say would operate regardless of Mueller findings.
Personally, I agree with you, I am also confident that Mueller will find what you want, or at least cast enough shade if he doesn’t. One cannot just forget the friendship with Comey, the texts of multiple team members, and the not only the past behavior of Andrew Weisman, but his involvement with Bruce Ohr in the Dossier development and use for the FISA warrant. And let’s not forget the leaks.
Beyond all of that, we have further reassurance that individuals on the team all gave money to the Dems in their personal life. Rest easy. You’ll get what you want while we won’t care what he finds.
(no message)
I don’t know if the report is going to make a specific finding on that subject though. If it does, then it will be accepted.
The only issue is the extent and whether it was criminal.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
The questions that are not yet answerable are whether it was criminal and whether Trump is personally implicated.
Sooooo, being rational, unlike you, I would withhold judgment on impeachment until we hear from Robert Mueller, the third of that name. Only if he presents clear and convincing evidence of a crime personally involving the Orange plague, would I be favor of impeachment.