Buzzfeed and the rest are bad enough.
(no message)
And then 3 days and 5 threads later find out it was completely false and moot.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
I don't know why you think he's making me angry. I was just pointing out his mistakes so he hopefully can decide to become a better person.
The point wasn’t whether twitter or the Beast was right in this instance. Never challenged that. The point is that you continually rely on such sources.
Also, the point wasn’t whether one poster suggested a hypothetical where Orange could have been involve with the Bezos leak . The point is in general no one believed that.
(no message)
(no message)
You are one of his secret admirers.
Conor cited a hypothetical that everyone including me laughed at.
Please, you continue to embarrass yerself. You seem to qualify for yer own term of a chucklesmog.
clearly thought so, and Jim B admitted that a lot of people did.
]
My help has been ineffective obviously.
You can never stick honestly to any topic. The criticism was that you regularly cite to unreliable sources such as twitter and buzzfeed. It wasn’t that one buzzfeed story wouldn't be confirmed.
You have also still not cited a single person who said they believed Orange hacked Bezos. Conor was speaking hypothetically.
You are just fundamentally dishonest such as when you cited to a poll that a majority of Americans supported a DACCA for Wall funding compromise for the premise that a majority supported the Wall. You do this regularly.