(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Anyone who doubts that fact is himself an adopted Russian Asset.
Obama admin thought about selling lethal arms to Ukraine then, but didn't dare to do it afraid of offending Russia. When Russia tested the prohibited ground-launched intermediate range cruise missile in 2013, which clearly violate INF, Obama didn't want play hardball by withdrawing INF. They just made protest. If we play your dirty political game, then Obama is more valuable asset to Putin.
until they gave up all their nukes via disarmament Treaty with US and allies?
here's an overview.
The Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances refers to three identical political agreements signed at the OSCE conference in Budapest, Hungary on 5 December 1994, providing security assurances by its signatories relating to the accession of Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. The memorandum was originally signed by three nuclear powers, the Russian Federation, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America. China and France gave somewhat weaker individual assurances in separate documents.[1]
The memorandum included security assurances against threats or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Ukraine, Belarus and Kazakhstan.
As a result, between 1994 and 1996, Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine gave up their nuclear weapons. Before that, Ukraine had the world's third largest nuclear weapons stockpile,[2][3] of which Ukraine had physical if not operational control.[4][5] The use of the weapons was dependent on Russian-controlled electronic Permissive Action Links and the Russian command and control system.[4][5]
Following the annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation in 2014, the US,[6][7] Canada,[8] the UK,[9] along with other countries,[10] stated that Russian involvement was a breach of its obligations to Ukraine under the Budapest Memorandum, a Memorandum transmitted to the United Nations under the signature of Sergei Lavrov, amongst others,[11] and in violation of Ukrainian sovereignty and territorial integrity. On 4 March 2014, the Russian president replied to a question on violation of Budapest Memorandum, describing current Ukrainian situation as a revolution, when "a new state arises, but with this state and in respect to this state, we have not signed any obligatory documents".[12] Russia stated it had never been under obligation to "force any part of Ukraine's civilian population to stay in Ukraine against its will." Russia suggested that the US was in violation of the Budapest Memorandum, describing the Euromaidan as a US-instigated coup.[13]
Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_weapons_and_Ukraine
balance between Western and Russia. Ukraine violated Budapest Memorandum at first, which says Ukraine should remain political independence, i.e. neither ally of east nor west.
Point is when the Russians were helping the Orange campaign, Orange and company were changing the R platform from calling for arms aid to Ukraine to not calling for it. Wonder why, genius boy?
If you don't understand my post, you don't need to response. If you want to change subject to how Trump did, create your own thread.
You are thick as a post.
(no message)
(no message)
platform calling for lethal weapons aid to Ukraine.
Stop with the bullshit.
Link: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/global-opinions/trump-campaign-guts-gops-anti-russia-stance-on-ukraine/2016/07/18/98adb3b0-4cf3-11e6-a7d8-13d06b37f256_story.html?utm_term=.542854426922
(I don't agree with this decision, but that's a different issue). I'm sure when it's proved wrong in the future, you will be the first one to blame Trump for this decision. Saw you behave like this many times. Withdrawal of INF is also Trump admin decision, not Obama's. We see what these politicians did and didn't do. Also, I have no idea why you're so stupid to link media report pre-Manafod dismiss. These reports on Manaford's Ukraine relation during July and Aug period in 2016 were the reason why Trump fired Manaford. You are clueless without any understanding except being ass.
Your absolute bias has you headed off into the woods looking for magic mushrooms that just aren't there.
(no message)
(no message)
I'm just asking if there is anything which tells us he isn't. So far, nothing.
But none of you will try to answer the question - seems to me to be a bit of fear when posed the
own research
(no message)
Can you prove that invisible rats haven't taken up residence in your bowels?
Hard to prove a negative, eh?
Prove they don’t.
and not the other way around.
It appears even the Justice dept. - and I'd say Trump via his responses to the interview - believes none of what he's done while in office and during his candidacy says he isn't in league with Putin.
(no message)
Both before, after and 6 weeks later? Ya know, consent can change even after the fact. #MeToo, #TimesUp
(no message)
Hopefully I didn't just violate the rules. Information in the public domain and such.
(no message)
(no message)
At least that's what I think he posted. I didn't actually read it.
(no message)
A good person to have on ignore.
one can rely on his bullshit schtick when he's angry at the world.
I haven’t read one of his diatribes in quite a while.
(no message)
but yet you kowtow to the liberal scum with your every move. Care to explain yourself?
You did notice I called out Jim on this thread, yes?
(no message)
(no message)
Where's the proof that Trump is in league with Putin?
(no message)
(no message)