After damaging the country with your bogus charges for 2 1/2 years, you now claim that you’re taking the high road for the good of the nation when you finally realize that you’ve got nothing from your witch hunt just like we have been telling you all along?
Be a man and admit you were wrong or be a liberal and pretend.
Because the GOP Senate has proven time and time again they lack integrity, and act as Trump’s servants vs stewards of the nation and US Constitution, impeachment is a non-starter.
Fact.
If and when the GOP Senate decides they can no longer survive as crooked and compromised disciples of Trump, then impeachment makes sense. Yet, as 2020 approaches, the most direct and effective method is a 50 State rebuke of Trump at the polls.
Let the GOP continue to parade Trump as the face of their party. He is who you have become. You will own him forever.
(no message)
You can search it if you like. Or not.
(no message)
It was mostly independent counsel and Pelosi, respectively. And the country wasn't damaged by Mueller's investigation. To the extent the country was damaged, it came from Trump trying to undermine the investigation, the FBI, the press, etc. etc. And it wasn't a witch hunt, as several close allies of Trump turned out to have admitted to crimes.
Chris may have been predicting impeachment, and may turn out to have been wrong about that. But so what.
(no message)
(no message)
Russia, Russia, Russia cries were absolutely damaging to our country which I now believe is permanently and irrevocably divided. There was an attempt to remove an elected president by political opponents in the IC which has permanently tarnished their credibility to at least half of the population. There was use of our government’s own intelligence surveillance against the elected president being justified with a piece of ridiculous opposition research done by his political opponent. There was an investigator who hired all Democrats to aggressively “investigate” the Republican President....and there were private messages revealed that confirmed that they had a predetermined goal of removing him from office.
Regarding the charges against “close allies” - none of the activity charged involved Trump nor was I about collusion. As for “close allies”, Manafort was recommended to outsider Trump as a campaign advisor, and he fired him within just a few months. Regarding Cohen......I agree that this is the biggest finding against Trump.....that he would ever hire such a weasel is disturbing......but if having a sleazy lawyer warrants a Special Counsel, there are a lot of people in DC who should be investigated. And, this investigation has done permanent harm to attorney/client privilege in its quixotic quest for collusion.
The Left knew from the start that there was no collusion. They knew what they would find (ask Van Jones - remember his project veritas admissions?). This was all an abuse of the system for political gain, and now conservatives will dish it back the same way in the future, and we slip further down the hill.
(no message)
(no message)
by the Republican President) and Republican Deputy Attorney General (appointed by the Republican President).
Somehow, with all that Republican-ness, a life long Republican in Robert Mueller gets appointed as Special Counsel and decides to throw away a lifetime of non-partisan service to his country and a reputation beyond reproach to bring down a fellow Republican President.
That's what you're going with?
.....Jeff Sessions.
I have no explanation for his behavior other than maybe the Left has pictures of him with barn animals.
All of those other people you listed don’t reign in the DOJ/IC. The IC regularly ignored congressional demands for information. All that we now know trickled out unwillingly over a long period of time.
Finally, Trump wasn’t really a Republican. The party was not his own yet when he took office. Many resisted him as able......ex Paul Ryan.
know what is actually happening ie; A group of republicans, Free Beacon hired Fusion GPS to investigate Trump before he was the nominee. They dropped the investigation of Trump once he was the obvious nominee of the R party. The D's picked up where Free Beacon left off - hence the Dossier. Just shit like that you can't get correct because you're so far up your own asshole you can't possibly get the facts straight.
presented this document that they knew to be false to a FISA judge to help justify spying on the Trump Campaign in classic Nixonian fashion.
You hear “it started as R opposition research, and your brain disengages. It’s original source is not the issue, who used it and for what is though.
the warrants extended to Trump campaign. Page was being investigated for being a foreign agent of Russia. You just can't get the facts straight can you?
(no message)
Traitorous is really what it is.
This douche'bag you're supporting is selling you out and he's telling you to your face, you're an idiot and you're eating up like a great dessert.
I can't be said enough; any other POTUS (especially Obama) had done 1/10th of what the Asshole in Chief has done, impeachment proceedings would have started the day after inauguration day.
Orwell would admit, he couldn't have written this, not the POTUS part but the part you and the rest of the supporters play in keeping him in there and that includes people like McConnell.
I understand occasional nicknames, and I appreciate them if they are funny. But yours have an element of palpable hatred in them that can only come from being fed lies about one terrible thing after another about Trump (some of them completely fabricated, and all of them spun in the most negative light) without ever being told anything good about him. The MSM whips you into an intense fervor of a zealot.
The second clue is that even when your own party leaders are now backing away, you can’t.
shines through with every post you make supporting him. You've shown to be one of the more dishonest posters here and all because you would support what he is. your ability to find the label given to him as the issue with my post goes directly to the lost nature of your character.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
and lies - worst yet is you like to perpetuate Trump falsehoods and condemn facts and truth tellers.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
With this joke?
(no message)
(no message)
Douchebag though he may be.
I don't mean to be a harsh about it, but really....
Crooked Hillary, Little Marco, Lyin' Ted, etc.?
But he shouldn’t.
I will say that I don’t sense Trump has any of the same hatred toward his target as Jim though. In Trumps case, it seems to be a means to an end whereas with Jim, it seems to be pure disgust and hatred.
Why do Jim and so many others hate Trump?
My hatred level about even with my hatred of Clinton when he was president.
(no message)
(no message)