(no message)
She has no morals, but she fakes having ethics better than most people. I do think she is actually a very good advocate for the Left. She can handle people disagreeing with her without getting morally outraged. She is very smooth, and rarely gets agitated in a tense discussion. She rarely runs from the fight.
for being a lying Clinton mole on the network. She lies with such sincerity LOL.
(no message)
while fake Donna wants to come across as not hating conservatives.
Fox probably should have hired Kelly Ann Conway’s husband if they were aiming to balance out Hannity.
(no message)
(no message)
Like it or not, Morning Joe is a conservative guy. He came into the House with the Contract for America, for chrissakes.
Nicole Wallace was Dubya's communications director.
And they have a staple of rotating conservative commentators on the payroll.
CNN has more.
So - shockingly! - you don't know what you are talking about.
And this from a guy who complained about us calling Alan Dershowitz a liberal.
Maybe they will next hire George Will or Bill Crystal.
How about you name one conservative who has been strongly against Obama and HRC policy and is not a Never trumper that either network presently give a primetime slot in their political debate shows.
Oh wait, I see. Conservative = Trump fellator. Anyone else = RINO!
How soon I forget.
Is likely why you prefer them.
I am right, and you are still not grasping what happened to you in ‘16.
You plural.
I suppose you have to, to help explain the furor over Trump from the normals. It is all just sour grapes!
....because it is that kind of raw conservative fire power that would be necessary to counter the multitude of TDS liberal Democrat homers that they would surround them with on every show.
Just so that I don’t let you wiggle away from the point of this thread, Donna Brazile is a legitimate liberal Democrat capable of holding her own. I can’t stand her, but I applaud FoxNews for yet again being the only major media outlet with the guts to present a potent example of both sides in a forum of political debate segments. Juan Williams is liberal, but he is timid. Brazile will not be.
Too bad the liberal media doesn’t have the guts to do the same, but they don’t want their groomed viewers to be exposed to thinking outside of their bubble.
PS - you don’t hold the time out card here. The 2016 election was a seminal event that the Left refuses to accept even legitimately occurred much less is willing to acknowledge the message sent. That denial has driven you to the brink of socialism, and has caused you to embrace candidates who fantasize about running over children. It further prevents you from seeing beyond Trump’s tweets to all of the impressive accomplishments he has achieved. But admitting that would require that you also admit how bad Obama really was, and that you were wrong. Since liberals have nothing if they cannot imagine themselves as intellectually superior, you can’t accept the reality around you.
(no message)
control her personal animus toward Trump from previous private encounters. This makes him your ideal candidate to put on your liberal news network. He might agree with Trump on an policy item, but spend the entire time railing against him which makes him YOUR favorite choice. He does not represent conservatives anymore, and very likely chortles about them with his liberal DC cocktail buddies. Bill Buckley would be ashamed. I gave you a list of 4 good names that would do a bang up job - it is not surprising to me that you don't like it.
Just so you know, I was reading George Will articles in the late 70's, and also watched his entire tenure on This Week with David Brinkley and then later with the woefully inadequate replacement Sam Donaldson. I know his passion for baseball as well as his inadequacies as an owner. i also know his need for ego stroking which eventually won him over.
I’m pretty sure. I see no evidence of God.”
(no message)
Personally, I was surprised to find out that Trump had thought about religion at all. He just does not seem to be the type.
But, I will also say that one of the things that allowed me to enter back into the Church was to realize that the Church is really more like a spiritual hospital for sinners than it is a museum to the saints, and that those inside the Church were sinners hoping for healing, not hypocrites cynically using the Church for status. It is possible that he seeks God in private, while consistently struggling to live the life. Is it likely? I don't know. It is possible, though.
I will say that I am more likely to believe that someone believes but fails to resist temptation to sin (as with sexual sin) than I am to believe that someone believes in Church Doctrin, but consistently supports laws that oppose Doctrine. The former is succumbing to temptation; the latter is just outright opposing in public life that which the Church teaches.
Link: https://www.cnn.com/2016/10/21/politics/trump-religion-gospel/
in the 2018 elections "for their own good." In other words, enable liberal Democrats.
Just stop.
But, conservatives = Trump blowers, so he is disqualified.