According CNN he has got 34% approval rating from Latinos, granted the error margin 12% is big in their poll.
Let D candidates focus on midwestern white voters in 2020. If Trump can win 34% Latino voters plus 2% more black voters led by Kanye West on top of his 2016 election votes, he will win.
Link: https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2019/03/18/cnn-poll-hispanic-support-latinos-donald-trump-marquez-pkg-ebof-vpx.cnn
(no message)
Comparing to Trump's 2016, the percentage increase will be translated to 1.5 million MORE popular votes (total Latino votes are 25 millions) in 2020. This is a huge achievement for Republican party and Trump himself considering Trump has been branded as a racist to Hispanic people since he entered politics in 2015. Of course, we're talking about this by assuming CNN's poll is accurate and Trump will get 34% Latino votes in 2020.
(no message)
economics also?
(no message)
Eli crows over a single moment-in-time poll with a 12% margin of error showing a modest gain in a demographic that still overwhelmingly hates Trump. And you call Rooster uninformed?
(no message)
that unless the margin is wrong to the high side, which is the assumption of all Trump haters, he has improved with the demographic. I assume it is probably pretty even either direction, so I will take the 34% and go with it. The actual could be that the support is actually 40%+. Who knows... I can't find the actual demographic on details of the poll. CNN could have surveyed 60% democrat and 40% republican.
(no message)
You gotta play the hand you're dealt.
For all intents and purposes anyway.
They mostly lost the unions and still crushed the 2018 election.
Things change. As the Democratic party becomes more and more woman-centered, they will lose some of the male minority vote. But they are picking up white suburban women.
I'll take pics, links or Penthouse Forum letters as evidence.
So much curmudgeonly anger leaving at one time.
The R’s right now are a minority, base driven party. There is zero coalition there. They can’t win a popular election. They can only win based on the gerrymander in the House, the Senate being controlled by places with more cows than peeps, and the prez vote being decided by the EC. You wanna bet on that future?
Which is what will happen if the Republicans start to pull 35% - 40% of black voters. They might wake up one day to see that 90/10 split flipped. Nothing lasts forever. But like you say, other groups would be in flux at the same time, so who knows.
I have no idea how they do it. Those that moderately support it have to put up with a lot of crazy shit just to avoid becoming Republican.
The D’s though still have a shadow of a coalition. The R’s have Trumpism and angry white people.
But it won't.
Granted, the Republicans are on life support.
What we need is a party that's balanced socially and fiscally.
You were saying?
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
76 and 80 when I first voted. RIP. There is only trumpism there.
(no message)
This is what I meant a few weeks back when I said "Stop voting for Rs". I could vote for Yang or Delaney, but I assume they have no shot at the nomination if they won't support crap like the Green New Deal, infanticide, etc. But these two that are talking about working class issues would pummel Trump.
*My source is Cole.
(no message)
Frank is a traditional free-trade, morally responsible, family values, fiscally responsible Republican of yore.
What is now being called "Republican" is none of those things.
People that used to call themselves Republican have abandoned the party of Trumpism, not because they don't still believe in the principles. So yeah, it seems like 90% of Republicans approve of Trump, but I'll wager it is not 90% of people who called themselves Republicans in 1990.
I know you know all this, but can't help yourself with a cheap, meaningless "gotcha!"
kept his support for Hillary a secret in the run-up to the 2016 election and at the same time said he was attending Republican Party meetings where he said people were virtually in unison saying they were voting for the Beast.
He then only admitted he voted for the Beast after the election.
He should've been a man and taken a stand before the election. Support Hillary, support Trump, support Gary Johnson for all I care. Just don't hide your support for a candidate and claim that you are considering the other.
I never hid my 2016 pre election total disdain for Orange or that I wouldn’t vote for him. The women at the R fundraiser were genuinely disgusted by him. They said they wouldn’t vote for him. This was within a month of the pussy grabbing tape. The vote for Hills was a game time devsion based on the polls tightening and the fact that I didn't want this disgrace on my conscience, and I turned out to be right. Bush 41 voted for her as well. Was he not an R? By the way still a registered R which I’ve been since well before you graced the planet with yer presence. Bot.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)