Looking forward to the excuses.
Looking forward to whataboutism attempts.
Looking forward to anyone saying this isn’t putting himself over country.
Link: https://twitter.com/abc/status/1138936855573999616?s=21
(no message)
Link: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2004/mar/12/20040312-120719-7926r/
that if he thought it was significant, he would notify the FBI depending on what kind of information was presented.
Now, you simply cannot exclude "whataboutism" completely here :
What exactly do you think the HRC campaign was doing taking oppo research from Christofer Steele ('retired" MI6) and his Russian sources for the Dossier?
You see, this is all perfectly legal unless you want to make new laws, and the Dems have been doing the same thing for years.
Now, I still think it was foolsih of Trump to give such an interview to Snufflumpigus. There was no need. It was so stupid on the surface of it to give grist to the Dems that it has me wondering if he is trying to force Pelosi's hand on impeachment. After the House files their articles, the trial would take place in the senate where Trump would be able for the first time to mount a defense.........." I call James Comey to the stand". Or Peter Strzok, or Clapper, etc. Not only do the Dems not want those people ever called UNDER OATH to explain their previous conflicting testimony to legislative committes, they do not want Trump getting a "not guilty" verdict (which would happen since in the end, the Dems have got nothing) just prior to the next election.
I am speculating on this, and i haven't decided yet if Trump is pulling a move or whether he is simply self destructive. I'm leaning toward the latter at present though.
(no message)
(no message)
Who is the person you guys are supposed to worship now? Bernie? Pelosi?
Never could stand, didn’t support and have been vocally opposed to both Clintons and Barry.
Orange has zero moral compass. He could easily be doing his shit as a liberal D which he was for MOST of his life. I would say the same things if he was in under their banner.
To me he is below the lib/rightie game. He’s a cancer on our nation and people.
(no message)
At least the sentences were properly structured for a change, tool.
(no message)
(no message)
But, he is no worse a cancer on this country than his main political opponents. And, opposing him plays into their hands. We only have two choices, and we have to pick the best option available.
I will say that Trump is more noble than the Dems to the extent he hasn't lied to get warrants to investigate people, or otherwise politically weaponized the DHS/DOJ, or otherwise tried to remove people from elected office based on fabricated evidence. Right now, I think he is just trying to play their game (which infuriates them), and I think many of the things he is trying to do are good. But, when he weaponizes the DHS/DOJ in exactly the same manner they have done, I expect all hell will break lose. Will be interesting to watch.
I also disagree strongly that the previous admin weaponized the DOJ against him. If anything, they were extremely cautious in how they dealt with the unprecedented level of contact and influence between one of our biggest foes and a major party candidate. Finally, he has certainly weaponized the DOJ against those who investigated him and wanted to do so long before he found the perfect lackey “Bob” Barr for the job. It’s the oldest trick in the book, try to put the investigators on trial when you are guilty. However, he is in the position to be able to do it.
...he can't later claim he didn't weaponize the locomotive. That's what the past administration did. And it worked for a while.
directed the FBI to illegally target Orange or his campaign.
You guys were always the ones saying where is the evidence? Saying it even if you believe it doesn’t make it true.
Either way, I sure as hell know I will not take on the sisyphean endeavor of trying to convince you. Totally not worth it.
(no message)
....any games you guys see as good as i am buying tickets.
(no message)
Maybe both NM and BG.
These four years aren't going to last forever.
......sigh.
All other games are open for me.
Hold a table for the Open.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
although it would be fully justified to “fundamentally” change such an unjust country.
Indefensible.
the law (campaign finance) is the dirt of this opposition research obtained from a foreigner is paid with $25,000 or more. Don Jr didn't pay a penny, didn't get any dirt from Russia. What happened is a classical Bait-and-switch. But we all know who paid a foreigner much more than $25,000 to get so-called dirt, dossier.
(no message)
will have new narrative as excuse on why FBI spy Trump campaign.
(no message)
with foreigners to the state. If you go to a foreign country for meeting or visit, except a few countries (North Korea, Vietnam, Romania, Albania..), when you come back you have to report every person you met and the content of conversation with this person. The reason for doing this is exactly what you said: it's espionage.
election laws.
(no message)
Tower meeting.
Orange is just the ultimate symbol of what we have become and what we want.
(no message)
(no message)
US Presidents set the standard.
Trump just told the world that he will is willing to commit a crime.
There is a reason why Trump obstructed the investigation re 2016 campaign.
Yesterday was a clear signal to Russia to do it again in 2020.
1) the patriot: fury. He’s a traitor.
2) the partisan: I don’t care, because of judges and taxes (this from the party of law and order and patriotism) MAGA!!
3) the rube: so funny! I love it because I hate the liberals more than I love America.
He has no notion that anyone might see this as inappropriate. Now If he were just another politician he would report it to the FBI in a public forum. Two birds with one stone and his ass us covered.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
How far back does your memory go? Dial it back about twenty years. Many of the same folks sputtering and displaying histrionics right now were making the same argument Republicans/conservatives make right now: they will support the president, despite his moral defects, because of what he's doing or will do on Issues A, B and C. Chances are, you were one of those people back in the 90s. I didn't vote for the morally defective Bill Clinton and I didn't vote for the morally defective Trump. I think self-described Christian conservatives ought to be embarrassed for voting for Trump. But I'm not interested in listening to hypocritical partisan hacks go on about the morals of people voting for him when they have and will again behave in the same exact way when one of their tribal members is the candidate who will put their people on the benches of our courts system or keep abortion legal or grant amnesty. The only people who want to listen to you on this count are other hypocritical partisan hacks.
And then to top it off, I have to listen to lefties who now make arguments like, "Trust the CIA." Are you kidding me? I know most your memories barely go back to the last president, but I'll bet you recall what your ilk was saying about the CIA under Dubya, right? Not to mention its illustrious history helping to topple democratically-elected leaders in various nations over time. But now we can trust those reliable, honest people, right? Yeah, I'm sure you believe that. "Trust the FBI." That's what liberals have contended for decades, right? Like back in the Civil Rights Era. Bless the FBI. And then let's ramp up anti-Russian rhetoric, because that's what liberals have always stood for, right?
These last couple years have been just mind-boggling for those of us who aren't partisan hacks, watching this elongated temper tantrum give birth to lefties stoking the flames with Russia and telling us that we should venerate and trust the intelligence apparatus of the state. I sometimes wonder if you guys ever pause to consider what you're saying or if you're just so fixated on getting Trump removed, that you never even think about how silly and stupid you sound with this stuff. You're losing and you'll continue to lose and you deserve to lose. Honestly, do you really care about winning? Do you think these are winning tactics? Do you think the American people really care if he passes on information to the FBI? Do you think most Americans think we're headed for a "banana republic?" Does it seem like most voters are as outraged as outrage overachievers here and elsewhere over his stupid tweets? What issues that poll high among voters do you put on the back burner when you devote all this time to this stuff?
(no message)
(no message)
We can run down a list together of people currently arguing that it's indefensible to vote for Trump for moral reasons, even if you agree with most of his policies, and you will find they were folks who supported Bill Clinton twenty years ago based on the exact same rationalizations. In fact, we can probably find a few honest lefties on this board who will 'fess up to voting for Bill and for those very reasons. How about if we start with current Democratic politicians, than move to commentators, then to personalities on this board. I'm looking at you, Conor.
I'll start: Joe Biden. Nancy Pelosi. Jerry Nadler. I was about to say Hillary Clinton, but I'm not certain she voted for Bill.
This is kind of fun. I'd be much obliged if you threw in the names of some more politicians, then we can move on to the commentators.
(no message)
It would help if you guys offered up a person who doesn't support killing babies. That would help me a lot. But, for now, Trump is the moral option.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Then why do you oppose Trump?
Or, do you actually think that stopping twitter obscenity is more important than saving lives?
used to demean an entire race of native Americans. I would suggest you edit this post so some of us will not have to retreat to our safe space.
is that they ran out of 7" shorts.
(no message)
(no message)
Two wrongs don’t equal fairness in any rational world.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
the DNC, Perkins Coie, Fusion GPS and Hillary years ago.
(no message)
They expect something for it and you arguably owe them.
What you go out and get from private firms that you pay for the service is not what the Orange squad did.
They knew where it was coming from, took the meeting and didn’t inform the FBI.
That is traitorous.
Others follow this more closely than I do. If you are interested, you may want to look into this yourself.
Link: FN: Dems hammer Trump for openness to foreign campaign intel, stay silent on Clinton, DNC outreach
govt about the nefarious activities of the Orange gang.
Your article reveals none.
Perhaps you meant that reply for someone else.
directly to the Orange squad. You can try the shuffle but that’s a fact.
(no message)
There is no indications of those govts giving or offering any dirt to the Clinton campaign.
If you disagree point to it in the article.
Orange will always put self interest over country. And you guys enable it.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
those info about how bad they said on his potential election opponent (Trump) in 2020 to FBI?
He’s a fookin disgrace. It’s the new normal though. Wait until you read the crappy here defending it.
We deserve him as we don’t have the morel strength to repudiate and throw his fat ass over to his pals in Russia.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Link: https://twitter.com/20committee/status/1138961580497002497?s=21