(no message)
Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=olC9gI1XbpY
(no message)
...on account of his having unlimited free time.
(no message)
The answer is that Sanders was not president in 2015, so no one much cared. Also, he didn't have a long history of racist remarks.
Same with the Baltimore mayor.
Don't you see that it is all just a distraction, to allow you to rationalize what you know is racism from the commander in chief?
And don't you think we ought to hold the president to a higher standard?
Again, where is your moral compass?
(no message)
Trump puts politicians in three different categories: (1) Loyal Trump Supporters, (2) Irrelevants, and (3) Enemies. People are placed there without regard to race. When he is attacked by someone in category 1 or 2, they immediately go into category 3 without regard to race. When they are in category 2 or 3, and they praise Trump, they immediately go into category 1 (at least for a short time) without regard to race. This seems self evident to me. The fact that you think he thinks of whites and blacks seems like just a convenient political tool/distraction. It is so transparent, I'm amazed you guys even try to make it stick. People who are not in crazy world see through this kind of stuff. But, I suppose if you are relying on the stupidity of the American viewer to retain your power, I can see why you might think things like this work.
Cole, Westcoast, Baron and Goat apparently have been distracted.
For every shitty thing Trump does, Frank or Chris will start maybe one new thread, and the Trump lovers start about five new whatabout threads.
Trump attackers accuse him of racism, and the Trump defenders point out the hypocrisy with several examples of Democrats doing exactly what Trump did (without similar racism accusations being launched), and you think the Trump defenders are the ones who are causing all this?
It seems like you want people to be able to accuse Trump of something without Trump being able to defend himself. I guess that is what this is all about, after all. Cummings attacks Trump, Trump responds...Dems attack Trump for responding, Trump's defenders respond...and now you are criticizing Trump's defenders for responding. It seems to be all about keeping the Trump folks quiet, so Cummings and others can attack Trump with no replies.
are clearly race based and designed to stir the shit which the cult gladly embraces when the inevitable criticism comes.
It’s pretty cynical to gin up his base constantly. Then HE plays the victim game. And so it goes.
Tell me one organization where you wouldn’t be fired if you told someone in the workplace to go back where they came from.
(no message)
stir up their white base? Did they continually tweet about it for days?
(no message)
(no message)
Today's conversation is unusually whacko and logic-free.
I am simply too lazy to do the research on my own.
His defenders scour the history of anyone who has ever been a Democrat to see if they've ever said something vaguely similar. They find one, and declare all democrats hypocrites for calling out Trump's racism.
And I have to ask. Are you actually too lazy, or is it simply that you have a life?
These are honest questions.
Methinks thou dost protest too much.
I personally did not, and would not have, brought it up. But, when scores of posts appear, dedicated to comparing Trump's tweet to a Sanders tweet from 2015, or some statement the mayor of Baltimore said, then you've all sold me that Trump's tweet was racist.
If you want to prove someone is a hypocrite, you can find one example, but that could be an outlier, and someone like you might say that was just Sanders, and he's a kook. But, if you find other examples, then a pattern starts to develop. When the defense is so readily available, and successive examples help make the case more solid, I think you could expect a pile on.
So, the latter.
Oh, and I was taking a fun shot at you with the laziness.
who reps Ballimer shithole and other places non shitholish calls out Orange over border humanitarian crises. Orange suddenly discovers Ballimer is a shithole and uses it to divert attention from humanitarian crises.
I'd like to buy the world a drink.
Link: https://observer.com/2012/04/bottoms-up-the-ballmer-peak-is-real-study-says/
popularized in Diner and Tin Men.
He had never heard of that. Granted, He's only lived there a year.
Ask 94 if he talks like the native yats from NO.
How does it compare to Philly? I've been there and both loved and hated the place at the same time if that makes sense.
is similar, but has it’s own unique flavor. The Bay has influenced a lot of it. It’s a place I have always liked.
Putting all of the BS aside it’s sad what’s happened there in the last ten years. The riot and inability of the cops to do their job has just killed the city.
There is nothing redeeming about the place, except maybe JHU.
Regarding the border, what has the esteemed congressman from the oversight committee done? NADA. The crisis festers due to Barry's invitation to the huddled masses to make the trek. The Dems are lashed to the mast.
Trump is an asshole, but he does know how to work the levers.
Regarding the border, Orange could have had that solved last year, but wants a campaign issue.
And yeah, he cynically pulls the levers of race baiting constantly.
The leader of the R party.
(no message)
...as well as National Cheesecake day and National Whistleblower Day.
The only logic there is the logic that hypocritical attacks and defenses are effective in the realm of politics.
For those of us who don't live in crazy world?
I can only speak for those who don't live in crazy world.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
You accused the tweets of being racist. Have you explained why? I am curious. Perhaps you explained elsewhere in this thread, and I haven't seen your post yet.
to be living in crazyland?
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
talks have you repeatedly brought up?
And this is obviously just more mindless GOP whataboutism, which Rube Nation never tires of.
It does't work so well against you, though.
(no message)
Goat started a brand new Trump-defending thread based on some out of context statement from four years ago by someone none of us like, to create some hypocritical strawman.
I think that was the point Chris was making, but I am not sure.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
This is starting to make sense.
(no message)
Victims Unite!
(no message)
to assume his mantle.
(no message)
Anyone who is both a communist and a racist is, by definition, mentally ill. Either of those in isolation suggest the possibility, but in conjunction, they confirm deep mental illness. He could've gone to Cuba for his honeymoon, but he chose a lily-white communist nation, instead.
I've also heard rumors of an intolerant tattoo on his backside.
(no message)
(no message)
Something about Oog and fire here.
You get them. You must. Does your butler toss them before you see them?
tireless efforts in opposing the Orange menace.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)