to get votes but know that none of the democratic candidates really believe it is a remote possibility?
(no message)
….and I think it is bad politics overall. So I oppose them.
But this article below is interesting, and if you really want to understand the other side, it is worth your time.
Link: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-for-reparations/361631/
are not aware of unless they are looking. I did find it interesting that a large section of the article referred to Chicago specifically. Chicago has been run by democrats for (if my calculations are correct) 89 consecutive years. Is is logical to conclude that maybe democrats do not have the best answers to systemic racism? Think of all of the major urban population centers in the U.S., the high population % of African-Americans in comparison to other cities, and the fact that they almost exclusively have been run by democrats for an extended period of time... like multiple decades. Are African-Americans better off in those areas? I think the article shows, and common sense can determine, that they are not. Think of Detroit, Baltimore, Chicago, Memphis, Philadelphia, etc..
Both parties were run by white people; it is hard to imagine there would have been much difference.
And I agree, it was likely more about race in the 20s & 30s than party.
(no message)
...of voters that saw through the "tax cut" push as a way to win their votes?