Menu
UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting
  • Football
    • 2024 Notre Dame Football Schedule
    • 2024 Notre Dame Roster
    • 2024 Notre Dame Coaching Staff
    • Injury News & Updates
    • Notre Dame Football Depth Charts
    • Notre Dame Point Spreads & Betting Odds
    • Notre Dame Transfers
    • NFL Fighting Irish
    • Game Archive
    • Player Archive
    • Past Seasons & Results
  • Recruiting
    • Commits
    • News & Rumors
    • Class of 2018 Commit List
    • Class of 2019 Commit List
    • Class of 2020 Commit List
    • Class of 2021 Commit List
    • Archives
  • History
    • Notre Dame Bowl History
    • Notre Dame NFL Draft History
    • Notre Dame Football ESPN GameDay History
    • Notre Dame Heisman Trophy Winners
    • Notre Dame Football National Championships
    • Notre Dame Football Rivalries
    • Notre Dame Stadium
    • Touchdown Jesus
  • Basketball
  • Forums
    • Chat Room
    • Football Forum
    • Open Forum
    • Basketball Board
    • Ticket Exchange
  • Videos
    • Notre Dame Basketball Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Recruiting Highlights
    • Notre Dame Player Highlights
    • Hype Videos
  • Latest News
  • Gear
  • About
    • Advertise With Us
    • Contact Us
    • Our RSS Feeds
    • Community Rules
    • Privacy Policy
  • RSS
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Home > Forums > The Open Forum
Login | Register
Upvote this post.
0
Downvote this post.

MIT covered up its relationship with Jeffrey Epstein.

Author: MAS (21446 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 9:49 pm on Sep 7, 2019
View Single

With the exceptions of the fourth estate and Congress, no institution in society is doing more to destroy itself than the Ivory Tower.

These folks are such frauds.


Link: https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/how-an-elite-university-research-center-concealed-its-relationship-with-jeffrey-epstein

Replies to: MIT covered up its relationship with Jeffrey Epstein.


Thread Level: 2

Ronan Farrow is an actual reporter - very rare. Universities are completely beholden to $$

Author: BaronVonZemo (59889 Posts - Joined: Nov 19, 2010)

Posted at 6:34 am on Sep 9, 2019
View Single

Though they pretend to be above such banality, they are not.

Thread Level: 2

OT but relevant. Another masterpiece by VDH on America's universities

Author: Eli (9555 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 10:08 pm on Sep 7, 2019
View Single

(no message)

Link: https://amgreatness.com/2019/09/01/from-icon-to-just-a-con/

Thread Level: 3

Professor Hanson is shouting into the wind

Author: Curly1918 (16440 Posts - Joined: Aug 30, 2017)

Posted at 9:59 am on Sep 8, 2019
View Single

The classics are dead. The shelf lives of our cultural products get shorter and shorter every day.

Thread Level: 3

VDH essays are always welcome. No one has had a better bead on American politics...

Author: MAS (21446 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 12:21 am on Sep 8, 2019
View Single

over the past three plus years.

He accurately describes the state of the American university right now. To a tee. The expanding administrative fat, a good deal of it composed of toxic diversicrats. Profs who rail against structural oppression and income inequality, yet cannot be moved to to utter a single word of protest against the pittance wages paid to the adjunct who may or may not have a closet down the hall, nevermind the grad assistants doing their work for them while they "research" their obscure, uber-specialized subjects that no one cares about and no one reads. All the while, charging students, most of whom would've been better off working and building careers over that same span of time, absurdly high tuition, justified by the incredibly misleading statistic that "if you graduate from college, you'll make, on average, a million dollars more over your lifetime."

As others have stated, the humanities and social sciences are the canaries in the coalmine for the real sciences and other disciplines.


Thread Level: 4

He gets it, I love to see interviews with him. Not one liberal professor could handle him in a

Author: THEISMANCARR (17199 Posts - Joined: Aug 10, 2007)

Posted at 12:51 pm on Sep 8, 2019
View Single

debate.

Thread Level: 4

Why do people pay great sums of money for humanities or social science degrees?

Author: NedoftheHill (44658 Posts - Joined: Jun 29, 2011)

Posted at 10:13 am on Sep 8, 2019
View Single

And, perhaps more importantly, why does the government subsidize those degrees?

If someone is going to pay for a degree, they should do a return on investment (ROI) analysis. Do I need this degree to help get a job? Will it help me get a job that will have a high enough salary that will allow me to pay the loans off? Can I get this same degree at a cheaper university? If no, then perhaps I don't get it, or perhaps I get it in my free time, online, when I am not earning a living.

If the government is going to subsidize (in any form) a degree, there should be a societal ROI analysis...how many African-Studies graduates does the nation need? 1? 5? Zero? OK, then don't pay for any more than that. How many Electrical Engineering degrees does the nation need? 10,000? 20,000? OK, then don't pay for any more than that.

I think you pay for two things in a university: (1) an education/degree, and (2) spcial access to certain employers. Almost all universities provide an education. The Ivy Leagues and the top 20's provide access to certain employers that the others do not. If you are paying an Ivy League tuition for a non-top 20 school, maybe you are overpaying...if you are paying for any degree that won't help you pay your loans, then maybe you are overpaying...unless you are independently wealthy and can afford it, and you want to give a nice gift to your kid.

Notre Dame does provide both (1) and (2), which is nice. Even so, some degrees from Notre Dame are probably worth as much as a community college certification when you apply for a job. You have to be smart about your degree choices.


This message has been edited 2 time(s).

Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good.
Thread Level: 5

Amen.

Author: BaronVonZemo (59889 Posts - Joined: Nov 19, 2010)

Posted at 6:38 am on Sep 9, 2019
View Single

(no message)

Thread Level: 5

tax write-off

Author: Hank the Tank (9413 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 2:34 pm on Sep 8, 2019
View Single

(no message)

Thread Level: 6

Not tax deductible

Author: NedoftheHill (44658 Posts - Joined: Jun 29, 2011)

Posted at 6:10 pm on Sep 8, 2019
View Single

(no message)

Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good.
Thread Level: 5

It's even more reprehensible at the graduate level.

Author: MAS (21446 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 2:04 pm on Sep 8, 2019
View Single

Programs routinely admit graduate students, knowing there is already a massive glut, knowing that these students will accumulate tens of thousands of dollars in debt, with a small chance that they will gain tenure-track employment. You'd be shocked how many of these students are ignorant of the dismal job prospects, in large part because their profs never tell them this. Yes, they should research this on their own, but that doesn't reduce the irresponsibility of universities and faculty propagating this system.

Thread Level: 6

Fact check: PhD programs do not result in debt

Author: Chris94 (36754 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 10:28 pm on Sep 8, 2019
View Single

The vast majority of PhD students do not pay to go to school. And most have stipends.

Getting a job can be tough, that’s true. But massive debt is false.


Thread Level: 7

Untrue

Author: MAS (21446 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 11:46 pm on Sep 8, 2019
View Single

Many grad students at second and third tier schools go into debt because of the limited assistantship or fellowship dollars available. Happens all the time. I know a couple at U of Iowa where the wife gets around 20 k a school year and they live in the basement of student housing.

Thread Level: 8

Small loans might be necessary to get you through. Not crushing debt.

Author: Chris94 (36754 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 12:32 am on Sep 9, 2019
View Single

THe notion that people are going into huge debt in PhD programs is just not true.

Thread Level: 9

“Crushing debt” is relative to what they will make for their degree.

Author: BaronVonZemo (59889 Posts - Joined: Nov 19, 2010)

Posted at 6:39 am on Sep 9, 2019
View Single

(no message)

Thread Level: 10

He wrote “more reprehensible.” Which is ridiculous.

Author: Chris94 (36754 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 7:46 am on Sep 9, 2019
View Single

(no message)

Thread Level: 6

do I recall you are a teacher?

Author: irishscooter (5539 Posts - Joined: Oct 1, 2008)

Posted at 4:48 pm on Sep 8, 2019
View Single

(no message)

Hate is just the bodyguard for grief
Thread Level: 7

Yes: Mr. Hand.

Author: MAS (21446 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 4:56 pm on Sep 8, 2019
View Single

(no message)

Thread Level: 8

A noble profession with many non-monetary benefits. Do you

Author: irishscooter (5539 Posts - Joined: Oct 1, 2008)

Posted at 5:09 pm on Sep 8, 2019
View Single

Think k-12 teachers should have college degrees and some master degrees?

Hate is just the bodyguard for grief
Thread Level: 9

Don't over-romanticize it.

Author: MAS (21446 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 5:22 pm on Sep 8, 2019
View Single

There are great moments, but much of the praise heaped upon us by some is overstated. Teachers cannot replace parents, and this is the root of most of the problems facing us. As I get older, I have more and more appreciation for the people who actually create things, and no, I'm not talking about "job creators." I'm often talking about what many consider blue-collar, manual labor jobs. They're as noble as any jobs we have.

Asking if some teachers should be teachers, even if they lack college degrees, is a fun thing to ponder, but, of course, it will never happen. If I ruled the world, would I allow some to teach, absent college degrees? Sure. If someone has, for instance, demonstrated both a gift for writing, and also a proficiency in teaching people in some context, it would be foolish to exclude them from consideration, just because he lacked a college degree.


Thread Level: 10

I was just trying to make you feel better since you seem

Author: irishscooter (5539 Posts - Joined: Oct 1, 2008)

Posted at 6:07 pm on Sep 8, 2019
View Single

A little cynical and angry. All good. I will add two points to the discussion: in my almost 30 years in the Insurance industry where 98% or more of executives have college degrees and some from top line schools the two of the three best I ever worked with never attended college. They were very conscious of their perceived shortcomings and compensated for it in glaring ways. One bordering on the tragic.

The other point is that in hiring many people over the years - some just out of school and others with 3-7 years experience, I have learned not to hire from the top line schools. I have found that in most cases, graduates from second or third tier schools tend to have a chip on their shoulder. They have something to prove, to earn. The top tier ones seem and many are just entitled.

Cheers


Hate is just the bodyguard for grief
Thread Level: 10

fantastic little treatise.

Author: und67 (6797 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 5:45 pm on Sep 8, 2019
View Single

you absolutely nailed it with these concepts.

msm, dnc, antifa, blm: trying to kill america.
Thread Level: 5

Because it’s education, not training

Author: Chris94 (36754 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 10:18 am on Sep 8, 2019
View Single

There are many things wrong with higher ed, but none is worse than the cost. It’s horrible. Universities waste money like you wouldn’t believe.

And when you charge so much, you get people thinking economically, in terms of financial returns on investment rather than in other, unquantifiable ways.

Liberal arts majors are not being trained; they’re being educated. And believe it or not, they are just as competitive for most jobs as are their classmates in the business school.


Thread Level: 6

it should be. But the sheer cost has changed the dynamic. Sad...but the universities have done this

Author: TakethetrainKnute (33493 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 8:31 pm on Sep 8, 2019
View Single

(no message)

Thread Level: 7

I don’t disagree

Author: Chris94 (36754 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 8:33 pm on Sep 8, 2019
View Single

(no message)

Thread Level: 6

Let me put it this way. Liberal Arts is a fine art, shouldn't & couldn't be mass produced.

Author: Eli (9555 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 11:55 am on Sep 8, 2019
View Single

We've talked about this for several times. Every time you're very defensive, thinking we attacked liberal arts education. No, we understand the value of liberal arts education, but it is for a few elites, not for mass, not for average Joe. With less quantity and high quality, a liberal arts degree should be the hardest degree to get, not an easy degree to get. If you want mass production of liberal arts degrees, it's kind like you want to mass produce Van Gogh, but you won't many Van Gogh.

Thread Level: 7

An undergrad degree shouldn’t be mass produced in any discipline.

Author: Frank L (64665 Posts - Joined: Sep 20, 2007)

Posted at 12:09 pm on Sep 8, 2019
View Single

That is the overall problem. Way too many people attending who have no business being there.

Also, the humanities here have been so bastardized that some just aren’t real degrees.

But if you are smart and a good student, you can do just fine with an undergrad degree in the humanities.


Thread Level: 7

Nobody is mass producing anything

Author: Chris94 (36754 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 12:08 pm on Sep 8, 2019
View Single

And it’s not defensiveness to note the difference between education and training. It’s not for everybody, sure. But neither should it only be for rich people, or the “elite.”

Nobody is trying to mass produce Van Goghs. You misunderstand what the purpose of education is.


Thread Level: 8

My original point is that it is not for everyone.

Author: NedoftheHill (44658 Posts - Joined: Jun 29, 2011)

Posted at 12:58 pm on Sep 8, 2019
View Single

Big Education is pushing people to get humanities degrees...and then when people are in debt with no ability to get a job, you say, "Well, it's not for everyone."

That was my point.

If we only need 5 Gender Studies degrees per year for the country, why give loans for 20,000 of them?...or, why even encourage people who can't afford it to spend money on it.

There should be a disclosure statement before they write their check: "This degree is in the bottom 5% of majors in its ability to prepare you for getting a job after graduation. You will likely need straight A's. Even then, you will likely be getting your job because you are very, very smart (if you are) and not because you spent 4 years studying for this degree. If you don't have straight A's, and still get a job, it may be with a salary per year that is less than the yearly tuition for the degree."


This message has been edited 4 time(s).

Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good.
Thread Level: 9

“Big Education.” Right.

Author: Chris94 (36754 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 5:37 pm on Sep 8, 2019
View Single

(no message)

Thread Level: 10

Just "Big Ed"...

Author: TakethetrainKnute (33493 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 10:08 pm on Sep 9, 2019
View Single

(no message)

Thread Level: 10

Why would you use this on others and not have it apply to your field? It is accurate.

Author: BaronVonZemo (59889 Posts - Joined: Nov 19, 2010)

Posted at 6:44 am on Sep 9, 2019
View Single

(no message)

Thread Level: 10

Really? You are going to let that stop you from making a substantive response?

Author: NedoftheHill (44658 Posts - Joined: Jun 29, 2011)

Posted at 6:12 pm on Sep 8, 2019
View Single

That was just to poke you with a stick. Don't let that stop you from making a substantive argument. Or, if you don't have a substantive argument, ok...use it as an excuse not to reply.

Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good.
Thread Level: 6

I concur. Even for the hard/professional degrees, college is for education not training.

Author: Curly1918 (16440 Posts - Joined: Aug 30, 2017)

Posted at 11:40 am on Sep 8, 2019
View Single

Training has to be hands-on in real-life situations.

Thread Level: 7

OK, but that is not how it is used today.

Author: NedoftheHill (44658 Posts - Joined: Jun 29, 2011)

Posted at 12:53 pm on Sep 8, 2019
View Single

(no message)

Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good.
Thread Level: 8

It is in the hard subjects. As to the liberal arts... I'm not sure what Plato had to say about...

Author: Curly1918 (16440 Posts - Joined: Aug 30, 2017)

Posted at 6:02 pm on Sep 8, 2019
View Single

the Green New Deal.

Thread Level: 6

That is a nice sentiment, but I don't buy it.

Author: NedoftheHill (44658 Posts - Joined: Jun 29, 2011)

Posted at 10:29 am on Sep 8, 2019
View Single

I went to school and received education and training, and I used my degrees to obtain jobs that allowed me to pay off loans. My children will do the same.

I educate myself on my own time by reading voraciously. I can sign up for free classes or even pay for classes to educate myself on non career oriented topics. There is so much available for free online. These other topics interest me, but I don't go into debt for them, because they are mere education...which is to say that they are a hobby.

Who in their right mind would pay $300,000 for a piece of paper that says they are skilled in their hobby? Only rich people, or people who are conned by Big Education into going into massive debt for very little reason at all. We are encouraging people to go into unnecessary debt...and when you encourage people to do that, they will do that.


This message has been edited 2 time(s).

Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good.
Thread Level: 7

I think you glossed over a key point.

Author: iairishcheeks (27164 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 12:21 pm on Sep 8, 2019
View Single

18 year old lumps of clay.

Thread Level: 8

Indebted, and therefore politically enslaved, lumps of clay.

Author: NedoftheHill (44658 Posts - Joined: Jun 29, 2011)

Posted at 12:53 pm on Sep 8, 2019
View Single

Not only can Liberals form them with (re)education. They can also enslave them with debt.

And, interestingly enough, Obama made that indebtedness direct to the government, not indirectly to a bank holding a federal guaranteed student loan.

Once indebted, many will feel helpless, and feel that they have to vote for government benefits (like debt forgiveness). These people are directly indebted to the government (not to banks thanks to Obama), so they can be controlled (that is, they feel like they are voting for people who control their indebtedness, and therefore they are more likely to vote for the party which is most likely to forgive their debt). It is a direct form of political control in a democratic republic. Lots of things wrong with our current system.


This message has been edited 2 time(s).

Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good.
Thread Level: 7

Again, it is not meant to be a financial investment

Author: Chris94 (36754 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 10:37 am on Sep 8, 2019
View Single

It is an investment in the soul.

It’s lots of other things too - a mark of class in our supposedly classless society - but a history degree is not training for anything...except life.


Thread Level: 8

I am sorry, but that is utter BS, especially since the internet can provide this for free.

Author: BaronVonZemo (59889 Posts - Joined: Nov 19, 2010)

Posted at 6:48 am on Sep 9, 2019
View Single

(no message)

Thread Level: 8

I've been holding onto this one for a while..

Author: iairishcheeks (27164 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 2:35 pm on Sep 8, 2019
View Single

(no message)

Link: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2019/09/meritocracys-miserable-winners/594760/

Thread Level: 9

I think I posted that before. Interesting point of view.

Author: Frank L (64665 Posts - Joined: Sep 20, 2007)

Posted at 2:38 pm on Sep 8, 2019
View Single

(no message)

Thread Level: 8

Do the poor have the latitude to invest a $100k in their soul? No, they do not.

Author: NedoftheHill (44658 Posts - Joined: Jun 29, 2011)

Posted at 12:44 pm on Sep 8, 2019
View Single

Should "investment in the soul" to the detriment of the individual's financial health be something the government encourages? No, it should not be encouraged by the government.

Your post is the sales pitch of a con artist if you are trying to get the poor to go so that you (your school) can get government money. You are using them, and conning them into seeking something that will cause substantial loss to them, just so you can get government money.


This message has been edited 2 time(s).

Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good.
Thread Level: 9

The poor have the advantage, many just don't realize it.

Author: iairishcheeks (27164 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 2:38 pm on Sep 8, 2019
View Single

So many of life's lessons can only be learned by being poor.

Thread Level: 9

They don’t need to. They will get schollys if they are committed.

Author: Frank L (64665 Posts - Joined: Sep 20, 2007)

Posted at 1:18 pm on Sep 8, 2019
View Single

(no message)

Thread Level: 7

Let me add this: That is an outdated sentiment. If valid once, it is not valid now.

Author: NedoftheHill (44658 Posts - Joined: Jun 29, 2011)

Posted at 10:35 am on Sep 8, 2019
View Single

Your sentiment is from the 1800's, or 1700's...and it was a common sentiment when mostly the very rich went to university, but even then it was not as expensive. Times have changed. Now we are encouraging the lower middle class and poor to go into debt for these bullshit degrees that will leave them hopeless. We should encourage the lower middle class and poor to go to university...but only for degrees that will improve their lot in life, not for degrees that will leave them worse off than they were before.

This message has been edited 1 time(s).

Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good.
Thread Level: 8

I think it depends on the student.

Author: Frank L (64665 Posts - Joined: Sep 20, 2007)

Posted at 11:11 am on Sep 8, 2019
View Single

My oldest is finishing a joint Law/MPP program. She just got a very nice offer from a big firm for govt relations. She also has an offer from the legislature.

My second is starting law school and I have no doubt he will have pretty good offers when he gets out.

Both humanities majors.

My youngest is an undergrad finance major. He shouldn’t have any trouble either.

I think we tend to overgeneralize.


Thread Level: 9

But both of your kids with humanities degrees

Author: WoodstockIrish (14678 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 1:23 pm on Sep 9, 2019
View Single

Went to law school. Smart choice.

Thread Level: 9

Each of your kids got training in a discipline that is marketable (Law, Law and Finance).

Author: NedoftheHill (44658 Posts - Joined: Jun 29, 2011)

Posted at 12:42 pm on Sep 8, 2019
View Single

Humanities is not marketable for itself.

Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good.
Thread Level: 10

The first would be quite marketable with just the MPP. She got both degrees in a 2 for 1 package.

Author: Frank L (64665 Posts - Joined: Sep 20, 2007)

Posted at 1:17 pm on Sep 8, 2019
View Single

She has no interest in the practice of law, thank the gods.

The point is if you have a plan, a humanities degree is just fine. And if you do well and get one, you will be educated, not just trained.

And even those with hard science degrees still have to do some post grad work to get where they want to be.


Thread Level: 11

Both of your humanities majors when to graduate school to get training for their field of employment

Author: NedoftheHill (44658 Posts - Joined: Jun 29, 2011)

Posted at 11:04 am on Sep 9, 2019
View Single

That proves my point.

Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good.
Thread Level: 12

That is true. But so do many STEM majors to fulfill their plan.

Author: Frank L (64665 Posts - Joined: Sep 20, 2007)

Posted at 2:34 pm on Sep 9, 2019
View Single

Not that many careers for BS math majors.

My daughter could have just gone into govt relations with a bachelors and done fine. However, the extra three years with the joint degree will put her well above where she would be earning capacity wise. The point is you need a plan and to work at your studies, not just party in a drunken stupor, taking cake courses for 4 years. If you do, normally you will be fine. Also, despite our current system of higher ed, some may actually come out educated.


Thread Level: 13

"Some may actually come out educated." The right end of the bell curve will, and will get a job.

Author: NedoftheHill (44658 Posts - Joined: Jun 29, 2011)

Posted at 4:09 pm on Sep 9, 2019
View Single

My point is that the central and left portions of the bell curve, who pick fluff majors, and who pay $60k/year...they probably aren't going to do well.

I don't think you and I are disagreeing on this.


Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good.
Thread Level: 14

I don’t think we are either. The left and center aren’t going far whether they go to undergrad or

Author: Frank L (64665 Posts - Joined: Sep 20, 2007)

Posted at 4:29 pm on Sep 9, 2019
View Single

not. And yes, if they go, they will usually pick a liberal arts major because there is more fluff there.

Which goes back to my original point. It depends on the student. The smart and motivated generally do fine, no matter the major. Those that aren’t, not so much. There are always of course exceptions.


Thread Level: 11

They are not just fine.

Author: MAS (21446 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 1:59 pm on Sep 8, 2019
View Single

I just saw the stats on this. Humanities majors are falling behind their cohorts in the job market. Understand, I despise the effort, mostly from the Right, to make college into job training. However, you're either "privileged" or delusional if you argue that job prospects should not be a variable in making the decision about a major or even going to college. Telling prospective college students who consider entering the humanities or social sciences, "Do your work, graduate, and you'll be fine" is irresponsible. Statistically, a whole lot of those people will not be fine. Many will end up working low-paying jobs after emerging from college, sometimes working alongside people in the same or similar positions, who never attended college, without the debt of the college graduates. This can't be repeated enough: the smart, ambitious college graduates would outpace most of their peers, even if they had never attended college. It's great that they attended college, but then assuming that most of the rest would also be best served in attending four-year colleges does not follow.

And here's the other thing to consider: if college is about education and producing better, informed citizens, are our universities doing that, in general? I think it's clear that they are not generally doing that. The level of ignorance, some of which is measured, is astounding for students who spent five years at institutions of higher learning. And the levels of apathy are similarly astounding. Millennials, for all the big talk, ended up being mostly no-shows at the ballot box and pale in comparison even to their parents' generation in terms of civic engagement.

It would be one thing if we saw college students graduating and demonstrating that they received fine educations. That's not what's happening. And for some of them, and this will sound hyperbolic, but they've emerged dumber than when they arrived, if they've had the misfortune to be re-educated into the dopey grievance belief system that permeates public universities and elite private universities, from the administrative level down. Four-year degrees are the most overrated product in the US, right now.


Thread Level: 12

You are mixing apples and oranges.

Author: Frank L (64665 Posts - Joined: Sep 20, 2007)

Posted at 2:12 pm on Sep 8, 2019
View Single

I’m not endorsing the current state of higher education far from it.

I’m also not advocating for the kid who wants to party for four years, sing On Wisconsin, get mediocre grades in some McMajor and then expect to walk into a good job. As I said, most of those don’t belong at a university or college.

What I am saying is if you are smart, take your work seriously, and have a plan, you will do fine with a humanities degree. And that degree will prove to your ultimate employer that you are intelligent, educated, and committed to doing well, something you won’t have if you are just smart with no degree. Which is why those that are smart usually get a degree.


This message has been edited 1 time(s).

Thread Level: 13

Neither am I.

Author: MAS (21446 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 2:47 pm on Sep 8, 2019
View Single

If college students aren't receiving much of an education at most of our institutions, it sometimes doesn't make sense for the smart ones to attend, either. Even the smart ones spend very little time reading and studying. Significantly less than a generation ago.

A few Silicon Valley companies now actually want smart kids who will not go to college. I expect more to do so as it becomes more apparent that, in general, higher education is sub-par, particularly relative to the costs.


Close
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • RSS