Ask yourself if Mr. Atkinson's resume suggests he is a courier for the Deep State/MSM fake news conspiracy.
Ask yourself if pursuant to Mr. Atkinson’s sworn duties, his assessment that the whistleblower’s compliant is of urgent concern should be ignored, notwithstanding that federal law requires the complaint to be delivered to Congress.
Link: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Atkinson_(Inspector_General)
If he was pressuring him to investigate Biden’s kid, that’s one thing, not good but likely not that much trouble for him.
If, on the other hand he was promising something in exchange for it or threatening to withhold something if they didn’t do it, he has a problem.
We shall see.
Either way Grade A dirtbag.
1) Biden never pressured the Ukrainians to do anything that wasn't Obama admin policy;
2) Nothing in Obama admin policy would have helped Biden's son.
Those two fundamental facts will be lost in coming months.
(no message)
(no message)
there for long time, did you ever see MSM talked about it? I just pointed out this observation from me.
(no message)
but let's watch the name-calling.
Key bit:
"As a result, when journalists seek the fire behind the smoke in the Biden-Ukraine tale, they often call to ask my opinion. Many are eager to flesh out what seems a satisfyingly simple conspiracy, but I have to tell them: It isn’t true. The timeline doesn’t work. The investigation into Burisma, Hunter Biden’s employer, had ground to a halt long before the prosecutor was sacked. A subsequent probe into the company’s owner was opened because of a request from Ukrainian legislators, not because of prosecutorial initiative. There is, in short, no there there; the bloggers are putting two and two together — and coming up with 22."
If you don't know this guy, he is a big investigative journalist who specializes in corruption. You know, the kind of thing that Biden is accused of.
Link: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/05/08/why-joe-bidens-alleged-ukraine-conspiracy-doesnt-hold-up/
You'll fall for anything.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Just rubes like you think there is a story.
(no message)
Cognitive dissonance is a bitch.
(no message)
(no message)
From an anonymous source with knowledge (must be true)
"“He told him that he should work with [Mr. Giuliani] on Biden, and that people in Washington wanted to know” whether allegations were true or not, one of the people said. Mr. Trump didn’t mention a provision of foreign aid to Ukraine on the call, said this person, who didn’t believe Mr. Trump offered the Ukrainian president any quid-pro-quo for his cooperation on any investigation."
No quid pro quo like Biden. Just looking for justice. He wanted an investigation because people in Washington wnated to know if it was true or not". Is this illegal?
(no message)
Let Congress conduct statutorily mandated oversight and see the complaint and listen to the recorded evidence.
Why does Trump Appointee Michael Atkinson view the complaint to be of "urgent concern?"
(no message)
(no message)
Did you not see crazy uncle Rudy on CNN trying to get ahead of the story a la Stormy?
(no message)
There will be a recording, and a transcript. Or there should be...
I like to think the whistle-blower is Bolton. Just makes me smile to think so.
(no message)