So, think about it: where are the pre-emptive leaks from the holdovers? Where are the leaks of bits and pieces from the report that put them in a good light?
Hmm, none to be found!
Rather, we have an hysterical caterwauling smokescreen instigated by an unnamed intell source who didn't even have access to the transcript and which the Ukranian president has gone on record denying.
Watch their patterns. Tells you what is happening. And, this smokescreen is a big deal. It tells you what's happening:
HOROWITZ. BARR. LIU. DURHAM.
They're coming.
Soon.
They will be cast ashore.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
In a law abiding administration, the whistle blower's complaint would remain confidential, and SHALL be forwarded to Congress upon the Inspector General's blessing that the complaint has merit and is of "urgent concern."
All that happened here.
But, in a corrupt law-breaking administration, the complaint has been hijacked by Trump and his minions ... because the real evidence would be damaging to Trump.
Now, we will play the State Television game of fabricate a story and keep telling it over and over, as the best defense is a good offense, ... knowing there is a nation full of dupes.
(no message)
The federal legislation is designed to protect the identify of the whistle blower. The legislative check 'n balance is the Inspector General.
In this instance, the TRUMP appointed IG deemed the complaint to be credible. Hence, it goes to Congress. It SHALL go to Congress. By law.
(no message)
Granted, he doesn't know who the whistleblower is, but he knows the whistleblower's motives are noble.
His heart bleeds over the claim that Orange has sacrificed $1.5 bill by becoming prez.
Good luck with that one.
indict McCabe.
(no message)
Also it almost NEVER occurs that they refuse to return a true bill.
That would like ND defeating UGA, Bama, and Clemson on successive weeks.
While. I’m not stupid enough to bet that these prosecutors couldn’t indict a ham sandwich, if it turns out they can’t, they will be laughing stocks as prosecutors.
(no message)
I am saying that it would be quite extraordinary if they can’t get a true bill here. I’m not saying that they don’t go to extraordinary lengths to get one, and the standard is pretty low in a one sided proceeding.
(no message)
Difference here is I’ve never said that McCabe won’t be indicted. In fact I would be shocked if he weren’t given Barr’s subservience to Orange.
(no message)
(no message)