(no message)
(no message)
Make it about 2020. Not 2016.
Wait for the full whistleblower complaint. Review the evidence and timeline. If Trump encouraged Ukraine to prosecute Biden, that is Count I. If Trump dangled military aid funds, that is Count II.
Let if fly from there. Enlist the freshmen lawyer congresswomen to try the case in the Senate, if it gets that far.
It’s crazy to begin an impeachment inquiry without having those facts. Whatevs, you guys are prolly also going to nominate Warren. D’s have Cole like judgment.
really good.
Link: https://www.mediaite.com/tv/fox-news-napolitano-to-shepard-smith-what-trump-has-admitted-to-is-a-crime/
At least, if it helps him, he should not release it right away.
I looked for the admission of guilt that Napalotano was talking about. Do you have a link? He wasn't addressing a quote by Trump, but a characterization by the reporter. I'm not saying Trump didn't admit guilt. I'm just saying the link you provided doesn't get us there. I'd like to know exactly what he did. Was it as bad as the DOJ soliciting from foreign sources to take down Trump? Could be.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
By the way you do know that Steele was a credible FBI source before Russia? He and his “foreign sources” led directly to the indictments in the FIFA case. The DOJ did no foreign source soliciting, but rather used a prior reliable source.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Link: https://twitter.com/jonfavs/status/1176205196008910855
(no message)
(no message)
it’s a trap”. That’s not what was said. Stop lying like your hero.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Hays' tweet, who suggest the transcript must have been changed, and all its follow-up tweets/responses from others, you will find out. My original post to respond to Ned. My point is on D in general, that is D will stick with their narrative regardless of the fact of transcript. I didn't mean a single D said everything I mentioned.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
in watching this DC circus. Isn't it investigating your political rival by one party on another party?
"Uh....uh....partisan impeachment hearings". Was he removed from office? "Uh...uh....he was cleared by the senate"
Even Mitt Romney won't be able to save the day for you again asin 2012, and McCain is gone.
Turns out that 2018 win in the senate was bigger than you realized.
I give the GOP a real chance at the House of Representatives now, and clearly, Trump will be boosted.
Certainly more accurate about Clinton, anyway.
(no message)