involved with Clinton Foundation working to combat AIDS around the world has many initiatives focused on reducing poverty around the globe
working on health and humanitarian issues in underdeveloped countries.
Obama's have the Obama foundation focused on empowering youth and young adults to grow as civil leaders and build strong communities
and lives at home giving strength to family as well as individual.
W Bush, after presidency has read a few books on George Washington and is dedicated to the continued construction of his library and
museum. He works on his painting.
I often read on here about the good works of men and women as adults from every political point of view on this board and the one thing
that stands with all is the praise for those who do good works whether they be soldiers, political leaders, important people in industry, involved in the
sciences and arts. The challenge is, being good people and doing good works without benefit or selfish ends. Who are those people who give of
themselves for the betterment of a nation and globe?
I'm wonder what Trump will be doing post presidency: My thoughts are, jail bound (one can only hope) however, if that is not his destination
what will become of him and his use of post presidency power and sway?
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
But you can relax...I am sure that, in reality, he can actually walk and chew gum at the same time...on occasion.
their presidency or vice presidency. It seems that the roadmap to become rich for Ds is becoming a politician at first. Your political influence from your presidency will de facto make you rich. Without being president/vice president, there is no way that Obama could have 40 million assets now, Clinton could have 75 million assets and Gore could have 200 millions. This is a typical roadmap of the 3rd world countries' politicians to become rich.
Manufacturing false facts seems to be all you and your group are capable of.
and climate change. Only people like you who doesn't know math can't figure out what it is.
(no message)
(no message)
One could say, he takes his orders from them.
snake. That you hold him in such high regard does not surprise me.
(no message)
(no message)
Bill Clinton damaged the presidency and polity with his obstinate refusal to accept his shame.
(no message)
Orange is seeking to top his feats every day.
Yet supposedly sincere and concerned folks like the evangelicals and feminists will full bore support one while full bore hating the other.
One word: abortion.
POTUS do once they leave office.
Not one person has posted on topic.
(no message)
(no message)
the tech revolution. 401K’s were fat. The nation prospered.
Yet the R’s led an impeachment witch-hunt.
(no message)
(no message)
well, right?
Looks like the D’s are playing by YOUR rules here with impeachment.
I don't do the economy scoreboard thing. You must be thinking of someone else.
Glad to see that enlisting or colluding with foreign govts to help a campaign isn’t justified by economic performance.
Would seem at least to be arguably impeachable, yes? At least as much as lying about a blow job in a civil deposition.
Both seem pretty mild.
I'm posting on my phone. I won't be in a position to do research for you for quite some time.
position.
It continues to astound and bother me though that you trumpies can’t bring yourself to admit that what he did here was very wrong. As I said before, at least Carlson isn’t trying to insult everyone’s intelligence on the subject.
I view impeachment as an absolute last resort no matter the party involved.
(no message)
The entire "whataboutism" play depends on not following up. Keep asking for proof.
(no message)
(no message)
Help me understand what you are talking about.
Trump openly and provably lies multiple times per day. What about Obama saying we can keep our doctor? First, it’s not a lie. It is a prediction that didn’t come true (assuming people had to switch) Second, I am not aware of anyone that has offered evidence that a significant number of people had to change doctors that would not have otherwise. We are just asked assume that unproven erroneous prediction is equivalent to daily lies about existing fact.
Trump Uses his bully pulpit to discredit the WB. What about Obama prosecuting leakers? Bogus. Trumps WB followed the rules. No one has suggested the ones prosecuted by Obama followed the official channels.
Is that enough?
Both sides do it.
In this case, I saw a screen shot of a document which showed Clinton writing to Blair asking his help in solving a situation to help the Democrats in the election.
-- Bill Clinton: "... In a political season, it would be big over here to get this open sore resolved. If you could have somebody take a look at it."
-- Tony Blair: "Sure, I will have a look."
I can see someone characterizing that, and saying no quid pro quo, or whatever, but the proof is the same as it is for Trump. Granted, the Trump supporters will characterize what he said, just like the anti-Trumpers will characterize what Clinton said, or just discount it as irrelevant because it is "whataboutism." But to say that no proof is ever offered is silly. It is there, although it is sometimes not reported by all news outlets, depending on their agenda.
The false equivalency is made use broad generalizations. The detail exposing the distinctions regarding the situation is withheld (instead of being acknowledged and reasoned). Once the detail is exposed, then it morphs into "favorable" characterization.
In your Clinton example, I have no idea what the "open sore" is, nor what had been withheld to obtain Blair's agreement to help.
I don't think the events are the same, and I hate Clinton anyway.
With Orange, it’s clear.
grubbing. Sure Clinton is not the best guy in the world, but he's definitely not Donnie D.
It's mostly conjecture like Uranium 1, Benghazi ...
Just makes you totally bias and a dope.
(no message)
A true American patriot. Then his idiot brother RFK went after the unions and probably helped get his brother killed. But who cares right?
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
ColeyO is upset about an immoral man, that's why he should have been impeached.
Wouldn’t you say?
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Remember Carter’s 18% interest rates. His Malaise speech blaming Americans. His tax on yachts and airplanes which nearly put those manufacturers and employees out of business. Solar panels on the White House since he had no energy policy. Carter was a fine man but lousy President. And Clinton was smart enough to do nothing. Except when he blinked on killing Obama when he had a chance to after the USS Cole.
(no message)
(no message)
Too bad you're such a partisan ass.
And I even admitted voting for him twice. So there’s that. But unlike you I admit my mistakes. And even after his presidency he has done little but create paint by numbers art pieces. Stop being such a dick. All the time.
It's about what they've all done since POTUS.
You really are a partisan ass.
I clearly said he’s done nothing except shitty art. Did you read that. WTF is wrong with you. I hope you’re just young and stupid. If not God help you.
(no message)
Sadly for Jimmy Carter, the bill from Viet Nam was past due and Opec became a force.
Reagan
Now answer the question - I know you can't because you, unlike Ellen De G. you're a douche bag.
campaign, embezzled money from the Haitian fund he set up, and just being an overall scumbag, played the role of a humanitarian. How in the world can you put him in the same group as Carter? Are you that gullible? Besides being a total fuck up his entire life he did one thing positive. He didn’t tamper with the Reagan revolution and got credit for a great economy. Other that that he was a fuckup.
as you or Baron could have imagined.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
and more horseshits.
the post is still there
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)