lynching." Nadler called the Clinton impeachment a "lynching." So did Jim McDermott. So did Harry Reid. So did John Kerry. Yet JimBecile, who is a buffoon, got angry at Trump for using the word, and his donkey myrmidon Frank L, a self-proclaimed Republican, chimed in in chorus. If Jim and Frank are representative of Trump's opposition, Trump will be FINE.
(no message)
(no message)
The fundamental moral flaw of whataboutism, as always. Prior wrongs don’t make today’s wrong right.
You seem to get that wrong intentionally, because you would rather focus on the wrongdoing than the hypocritical selection of wrongdoings to pursue.
Rather than just condemn the crap he pulls, you try to make it seem like everybody does it.
And you usually do this poorly, misapplying analogies and making absurd comparisons.
their positions on the subject have evolved.
that you are not, in fact, a Republican, among other things.
I was unaware he even said it until reading your posts......err twitter feed here.
Dude, as even Eli points out, I have called Biden just about everything other than a child of god here.
I just don’t excuse assholes on the R side of the aisle like you do.
At least, he's as much your boy as Trump is mine.
(no message)
(no message)
used by the R’s against Clinton in 98-99 be used by the D’s now?
If you need them to be explained, there is a great video by one of the R impeachment managers at the time you can google.
a right to the term.
Because the Dems al of with their accomplice MSM reacted with widespread selective outrage, this point is very pertinent, and thus a perfect candidate for your convenient “Whataboutism” defense.
Nadler is on the committee impeaching Trump. It is relevant. Black caucus members used the same term in the same setting to describe proceedings in the past. That is relevant also.
Link: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/flashback-top-dems-including-nadler-called-clinton-impeachment-lynching
(no message)
I’m sure all the liberal media outlets could have reported the same language from Democrats but it takes much too much time to do a Google search. Or maybe they are just bias. Won’t matter, even when other outlets report something they never pick it up. Doesn’t fit their narrative.
(no message)
Anything less is hypocritical and destroys your credibility.
Right? Hypocrite.