Lawyer suffered a broken nose and was knocked unconscious. As the upstanding citizen's new attorney said, it was not a "serious attack." I wonder if they could've gotten a conviction if he murdered his lawyer on tape?
The only surprise here is that it wasn't described as a "random attack" by the newsreaders.
Link: https://wgntv.com/2019/10/24/defendant-caught-on-video-punching-his-attorney-found-not-guilty-in-the-attack/?fbclid=IwAR3318hIrO3OGwzAwy81VX1L89LeN4YDsR4sgWQeFJ9lZqaPzXFt-GT_wlc
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
When a black man attacks white people, it is, by media definition, "random." A couple weeks back, I believe on Philly, a black man attacked three or four white women on the street in separate attacks. These were described as "random." Imagine a white man attacking three separate black women throughout a day and being characterized as "random."
It literally takes a hero to vote honestly as a juror in inner cities,. A high profile case. There is also indoctrination as well, certainly. But it is more the former imo.
This is also why the swamp people in Washington have acted with such impunity. They know what a DC jury will vote since the indoctrination includes extending the protection of other black people to the Dem party also.
(no message)
(no message)