I mean if hearsay and fact witness opinions are admissible evidence why not?
(no message)
You could give your testimony on TV. get money.
I’m sure they have info that would clear Don completely. He’s just blocking their testimony on principle.
And I’m sure if their testimony would clear him, he wouldn’t drive them over to Capitol Hill on his golf cart.
as those notes are Federal property and not personal.
sham continues in the Intel committee, Trump and his staff enjoy almost no rights as we have seen. Schiff can make up the rules as he goes.
Put your cowardly names on the vote, and let’s go. Otherwise, quit whining. You’re fine with Schiff exercising unfair rules like only allowing himself to subpoena witnesses, coaching of witnesses, and denial of questions by r’s.....all in secret with selective one sided leaking to the press from himself, but then you are upset that Trump uses one of the only powers at his disposal (withholding testimony until a formal hearing is called)?!
The Dems really don’t want any surprises again like the Mueller hearing. They want a confirmed kill. But they don’t have the witnesses for it on their own, and they will further be embarrassed when they hear Staff testimony in the real thing.
(no message)
(no message)
Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBY_aDd5knE
(no message)
(no message)