(no message)
(no message)
Horowitz has been a lifer, and this report was supposed to be released in May. We saw in the past how these reports allow input from the targets. There will be abuse (use of the Dossier which the FBI knew to be false, as well as altering the applivation), but there is no reason that Horowitz HAS to look into the origins of the Dossier. That will come with Durham, as I suspect as Horowitz doesn't want to nail his longtime buddies. If he does - awesome!
Your cluelessness has no bounds. Remarkable.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
I happened to be in the car and heard all that.
The points mentioned were his (and I do agree and have already been of that mind set), and other points I make are also frequently from other sources as I do not live in Washington DC, nor do not have first hand sources. But the only part I identified specifically to me (the last sentence where I said "I suspect" is my own take, not Rush's. I do not intend to take credit for his thoughts, and should probably have referenced him and will do so moving forward.
On another note, kudos to you for listening to info from outside of your bubble. Too many don't do that. It is hard for me to listen to Bill Maher, but I respect his intellect. The same is likely to be said about you and Rush Limbaugh.
(no message)
(no message)
As you well know as a defense attorney, a guilty defendant will always attack the process.
The standard for a warrant, FISA or otherwise is very low, something the bots have yet to figure out.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Be the nail.
(no message)
(no message)
He was a line assistant under Strzok.
WaPo ID'd a line assistant under Strzok has the falsifier of evidence. WaPo then stealth-deleted that reference from its article because it made it too easy to ID Clinesmith.
Not only was Clinesmith part of the Trump FISA app, he also interviewed PapaD.
Further, he was Strzok's errand boy when investigating Hillary, who Clinesmith vocally supported.
It's all coming out.
Stage 4 for you soon.
(no message)
Mix of 1 and 4.
Not so much anywhere else Cole.
(no message)
Oh that’s right, yiu don’t need proof of personal involvement so long as its Obama.
Sick pup.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
There is a difference in being a Republican and a member of the cult of the dear leader.
Ironic, that I have been an R longer than Orange and likely longer than you have been alive.
It’s a shame what people like Orange (a lifelong D) and you have turned the party into.
(no message)
Others, not so much.
I would take almost any of Orange’s 2016 R competition over either the D or him in 2020.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
You are the one who told us Comey was above board. What a farce.
(no message)
(no message)
You'll agree that the FISA process had its errors, but you'll argue they were only committed by low-level associates.
Remember, both of you started out by saying that it was all above board.
later defending the guys who get them.
Never said differently.
Sounds, like you’ve got nothing as usual and somehow the Clinesmith factor needs to be blown into something that it likely isn’t. I’ll wait for tge indictment.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)