......was Nancy’s aid speaking out of turn as referenced in the twitter below, or is it true that she is postponing the vote because it is not in keeping with the spirit of the Christmas holiday?
If Pelosi’s people say that impeachment is not in keeping with the Christmas holiday spirit which is widely known to be a spirit of love, doesn’t this mean that the spirit of the impeachment effort is one of hatred?
If it is unworthy of Christmas time, why is it worthy at any other time?
And why are the Dems so myopically focused on Judeo-Christian tradition? Do they not care about the “spirit” of other religious holidays throughout Jan, Feb, March, April, May, etc. ?
Trumpians: "We dare you to impeach Trump"
Sept 25: Pelosi announces impeachment inquiry.
Trumpians: "Oh yeah, we dare you to formalize the inquiry by voting on it"
Oct 28: Pelosi announces the House will vote on the inquiry. Motion passed on Oct 31.
Trumpians: "Well, why is everyone testifying privately? Why don't you want them to testify in public. What are you afraid of?"
November: House Intelligence Committee holds public hearings.
I'd say the Trumpians track record ain't so hot. Nancy's been systematically killing every Trumpian talking point on impeachment. I'm pretty sure she'll best you on this one too. And this is coming from a guy that thought she was weak and past her prime. Me.
with your mouth full.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Or Chuck Schumer.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
What a charade.
Maybe you’d care to wager.
Baron -- "Nancy halted impeachment proceedings."
eftg1 (from the sun room in the State Hospital) -- "All because Hillary the war monger lost."
und67 -- "not one shred of evidence except for some biased liberal hearsay .... under their completely self motivated and deranged attempted coup."
Cole -- "does not mention bribery, only with respect to Hunter."
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
It attaches a "this-is-what-democrats-want-to-attach-as-the-REAL-backstory" to a situation where there is zero evidence of impeachable behavior. And that's all it does. It's a forced narrative that liberals will jump on because they believe in trying to do whatever's necessary to attack the President, and Republicans will reject.
The Dems aren't claiming that the Bidens are innocent of corruption. They are just claiming that Trump is using bad process to investigate corruption that might implicate the Bidens.
the latest impeachment theory.
Annotated, for your limited attention span.
Link: https://www.cnn.com/interactive/2019/12/politics/trump-ukraine-impeachment-inquiry-report-annotated/
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
He sounds like he could be a witness for impeachment. He has what you define as "evidence".
(no message)
(no message)