.....now make no mistake, the people that they bring up there will say whatever the Dems ask of them ahead of time to say (or at least the Dems know what they will say). But I still think there is the possiblity that this is Pelosi's plan to extricate the Dems from the impeachemnt mess. Assuredly, they will testify that they are appalled, but these guys may be called upon to "take it out of the Dems hands" so that they can face their base and not be destroyed for their farcical impeachment process. We will see.
(no message)
You should listen to those profs...or, as you dismiss them, "profs."
You do understand what pondering is, right? You may have noted the "we will see" at the end of the post?
I also know that I have a great grasp on exactly what is going on. And I have no respect for partisan hacks like that Stanford "prof" who put out the hypothetical about Trump and LA emergency relief. First off, she intentionally makes up a scenario that the less engaged viewers can easily take as fact when it is fiction.
On top of that, it is a false analogy since she assumes Trump had conversations with the Ukrainians that never happened and of course for which there is no evidence.
Finally, this "witness" assumes Trump's guilt when he has never even faced a trial.
Upon looking at her backgroun, the "prof" is an avid HRC backer and donor who was on the very short list for the SCOTUS had HRC won. She is obviously bitter.
And in the legal world, "expert" witnesses are all whores.
Dems want a witness to say A. They interview three witnesses, one who says A, one who says not-A, and another who says B. We get to hear from witness A. Then we get to hear authoritative harumphs from Chris94.
Media wants a journalist to say A. They review three article submissions, one which says A, one which says not-A, and another which says B. We get to see article A. Then we get a link and an authoritative harumph from conor,
And even though it is a minority position, it is presented as if it is unanimous.
(no message)
....stating the case plainly and decisively.
Link: https://twitter.com/New_Narrative/status/1202268957627109378
(no message)
(no message)