They need to look into it more, let it go to the courts - where the Democrats might win, and Mulvaney and Giuliani and Bolton might be forced to testify - and take your time.
That is an interesting argument. Reasonable people can disagree on that.
It is also a process argument.
Orange Gestapo would prolly like someone louder and crazier.
I still have problems with the lack of direct evidence in an intent case. Told you that before.
(no message)
(no message)
So, I do think conservatives should listen to him.
Having said that, I recall him getting a Catholic issue very wrong a year or so back on his blog. I forget the details, but I vaguely recall that he fundamentally misunderstood the pope's role in the Church, and so he posted from bad facts. So, he should probably stay on issues he knows, like constitutional law.
An impeachable offense.
(no message)
necessary to establish the crime of bribery. Thus, Dems currently have no case. He also says that more time is needed to see if there is actually a case to be made; that Dems have moved too fast.
Nuance. Beyond you.
to impeach. I have said much the same thing on this forum. Of course when the impeachee has raised redunkulous privilege arguments to prevent that evidence, it hurts the argument.
(no message)
(no message)
Therefore, more time is necessary for evidence to be compiled.
That is also what he says in his written statement. Which is 53 pages long for some reason.
But he is making a process objection.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Link: https://lmgtfy.com/?q=What+does+Turley%27s+penis+look+like
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)