(no message)
abuses power.
The GOP and most conservatives have made their bargain with Satan and don’t care.
(no message)
These Democrat party professors are advocates who are merely “arguing” the significance of circumstantial evidence.There is no smoking gun here with Trumps fingerprints on it that might result in a removal vote by 2/3s of the Senate. That is not what they are seeking. They have two goals: Turn the Senate “trial” (sic) into an anti-Trump pr circus and prevent Trump from using it to expose Bidens own corruption.
Our fault. Especially those of us in the GOP. When you reach the point we have, nothing is damning if it’s your guy involved.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Link: https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/755/text
They could have written an Article 3 charging him with the murder of General Soleimani, but that does not constitute evidence.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
It’s very damning.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
working for Trump - Giuliani is basically the iceberg the Trump ship has collided with.
"everyone was in the loop"
(no message)
I know you didn't address your post to me, so I haven't read the link, so I don't really know the details there, but because of Chris94's post below, it seems that this has something to do with a corrupt act by a US leader in the Ukraine.
The whole country knows Orange is corrupt and abuses his power.
Even his staunchest defenders know it.
We have reached the point that almost all of them don’t care. You know judges, 401K’s that kind of stuff. Folks like PB would accept authoritarianism so long as they are prospering.
Not so sure the situation would be different on the other side if Hills were prez.
Let’s just get this charade over with.
The whole thing is just disgusting and an indictment of us as a people that we will excuse it.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
That tells me you recognize the issue, and your attacks on Trump, even if true, are not made on principle but for partisan political purposes. You know that your side is guilty, and you just hope no one will notice.
(no message)
Do you think everyone voting for Trump are "bots"?...or only the rally goers? Does the term include even those who vote for Trump as the lesser of two evils? If it does, it is a meaningless term like your racism accusations in the past.
You decide because clearly you have received enough information on Trump to know.
I know all about Trump. He just remains the lesser evil that I voted for. Indeed, he has done a lot of good (trade negotiations returning jobs to US, rolled back regulations, judge appointments). Granted, he has done a lot to tarnish the image of the US abroad among the common man, but his unpredictability has generated some fear in our enemies, which is nice. He would sit down with the Dems and do deals on infrastructure and immigration if the Dems would do it, but they won't. Too bad, because a lot of good could be done.
Conor stopped replying, because he knows this sub-thread is embarrassing to yours and his positions, but you don't seem to get that.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Or would have been, in any other presidency.
This guy supposedly has lots of documents to back up his amazing claims.
My guess is that our right-wing friends here will just have to ignore it completely. If they listen, there is no way their hero can be innocent...and that will be unacceptable.
None will pay attention. You watch.
R. Hide was somebody who would hang around … at the bar"
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
the DEMS are going to come out looking more foolish than they do now, if that is even possible..
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)