Now Dr Brix predicting 100,000 to 200,000 deaths, "if we do things almost perfectly".
How could Donald be so wrong? Is he that ignorant?
Link: https://www.yahoo.com/news/dr-birx-predicts-200-000-115800421.html
Replies to: Now Dr Brix predicting 100,000 to 200,000 deaths, "if we do things almost perfectly".
Because Democrat controlled metro areas are full of morons who didn’t do what was necessary.
(no message)
Is this a Chinese propaganda account?
(no message)
doesn't pay to respond to him.
(no message)
Are you the "official" white trash spokesperson?
(no message)
The jet fuel magnate, PB is the official spokesman (no God damn spokespersons here) for the
deplorable element of society.
LOL
(no message)
Yeah, Iowa cheeks is still smarting from the sting of not being selected.
(no message)
deleted
(no message)
Still getting that paycheck from George Soros I see.
(no message)
It would be smart for campaigns to assign volunteers to various forums.
Arm them with daily talking points and links.
But, they really should try to get people who understand human nature a little better than '64 does. Then again, maybe his goal is only to keep the Dem faithful in line, and not to actually gain any new votes for the dem candidate. If that is the case, maybe his posts are not so insane.
Not effective Ned, attacking the person who posts an article that outlines Donald's totally inept
blundering approach to the covic epidemic rather than attempting to defend his botched action. But on the other hand how does one go about defending the indefensible? How can one excuse Donald's 8 weeks of inaction giving the virus a running start. You got a problem there Ned.
My post was effective for its intended purpose. Your problem is you didn't understand it.
(no message)
Dr. Birx, doubt it?
(no message)
talking about ignorant. You are as ignorant as they come.
(no message)
How about a link? Guess that's not the white trash way, Huh? LMMFAO at you ignorant Trumptards.
(no message)
Great rejoinder .... err, not really at all...
(no message)
So, anything less will be a total success for Trump. Good to know.
Every now and then I think about placing you on "ignore," but then I realize I wouldn't see the good you are doing for Trump's reelection chances.
Ridiculous.
Not one post or poster here, ever, has changed one vote or outcome of any election ever.
To suggest otherwise is just silly.
Maybe true. So, why are we here?
(no message)
Why am I here?
I came here because Kyle and Frank asked me to, they asked for a favor. I said, the real favor, follow my advice and ban all these posters because a loser is a loser.
Well, thank you for gracing us with your presence!
(no message)
You should see my watch.
My watch costs more than your car. I made $970,000 last year. How much you make? You see pal, that's who I am, and you're nothing. Nice guy, I don't give a shit. Good father, **** you. Go home and play with your kids. You wanna post here, post. You think this is abuse? You think this is abuse, you ****? You can't take this, how can you take the abuse you get on this forum?
In a thousand yrs I could never have thought you would post something like that. Surprise!
On as side note - That's Canadian money - How much is that in real money?
i too am surprised
Not a normal Rooney post. Let’s try to be civil - these are difficult times.
I have a Hulk and a Kermit.
Do people seriously not understand the source material for my last couple of posts?
(no message)
I didn't - Me Duh
(no message)
Jesus. I copied the whole thing.
You call yourself a movie buff?
Alex Baldwin in Glengarry Glenross....
Never seen it.
I am definitely not a movie buff...but I think everyone here knows that.
Well that would make the whole exchange above awkward.
If you are ever out somewhere and you hear one person ask another, "Why are you here?" and the respond heard back is, " I came here because Mitch and Murray asked me to, they asked for a favor" chances are it's me saying it. It's my go to response in that instance. I think it's hilarious. Probably explains why most people socially distance from me.
I love it. Well Done.
(no message)
Ditto from me
I rescind my scolding.
Keeping it there may well be. It’s all of our success. Give him the credit. I don’t care.
(no message)
I'm not trying to give Trump credit for anything. I'm just poking '64 for his ongoing stupidity.
(no message)
Rather than attacking me Ned, why not try defending Donald or refuting the article I posted?
OK, it is an impossible mission, but you could at least give it a try. 8 weeks of doing nothing to give the virus a running start.
Why would I bother doing that? When you become effective, I will consider it.
Right now, you are weakening your own side.
Isn’t that being unfair to stupid people?
(no message)
Heh. Good point.
(no message)
Okay, you’re right here.
(no message)
No, less than 1 month ago the Fat Fuck said "we're doing so good". Now 100,000 to 200,000 dead.
Your hero has totally fucked up. If he had an ounce of decency he'd resign. This job is too tough for the Fat Fuck. He should go back to running scams in NY.
Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ch7_t2Ri2Zg
Meh. Libs were saying the same thing back then.
Just for example, there is great video of DeBlasio and the NY Health Dept. Director out there if you want to look for them. They were saying the same kind of stuff you criticize Trump for saying. If they really believed their rhetoric, I suspect they did more than Trump to make NY unprepared.
It was Donald's call. He had the best info. He made the wrong call and the virus got an 8 week
running start.
I have already pointed that out and it’s true.
However, the buck stops at the top. And the same message was being delivered.
DiBlasio though has much to be sheepish about.
We are largely on the same page here.
I stopped getting worked up about what Trump says a long time ago. The further away from a date at which something is to happen, the more likely he is just blustering...or just as likely, maneuvering himself and others towards the final result he wants (which may or may not be what he announces). I don't think he announces what he wants ahead of time to force everyone to that precise place necessarily. I think he announces "what he wants," say, 3 months ahead of time, because he thinks that is what is best to announce at that particular time (3 months early) to get people to where he really wants them to be 3 months later (which may or may not be what he announced).
It is typical CEO behavior. It is frustrating as an underling to hear your CEO announce goals that may not be achievable, but they do it all the time to force you to extend yourself as much as possible in that direction. The CEO may not actually know what is achievable when he announces goals, but he does know that if he underestimates what is possible, people will often do something less than what is possible. Not knowing whether he can get $10M or $14M from a project, he may demand revenue of $16M from the project (which may be totally unreasonable), but that may get the project closer to $14M than if he had demanded a very reasonable, middle of the road $12M. He's not concerned with estimating correctly; he's concerned with motivating people. Sure, if the media followed corporate decisions like they do politics, the media would rip the CEO a new one for "predicting" $16M, but it may be the right thing to say to get as close to $14M as possible. He can be "wrong" while doing the correct thing for the company.
I think we can safely say, you've never been negatively worked up about what Trump says or does.
Your analysis of him thinking ahead of the rest of us (CEO) is the same as saying he's playing 3D Chess while the rest of us are playing checkers. There couldn't be anything on this planet
more further from the truth than that - your statement further exemplifies what we all know is your outward and constant support for is moroniship and never you being worked up
about his doings in a negative manner - you've supported his candidacy and his presidency from the outset and haven't looked back.
Why the continued dishonesty?
Like I said, anti-Trumpers will criticize him for not being correct initially & ignore his results.
3D chess doesn't necessarily mean he is smarter (although many or most use it that way). It may mean he is playing a different game, and you haven't noticed yet. He is the first non-politician, non-general to be president. It should not shock you that he handles things differently. CEO's are a different breed, in my experience.
Really Ned, what are those good results Donald has achieved? What am I missing?
(no message)
You miss almost everything...especially how to achieve your objective.
(no message)
He is validly criticized for wasting the whole month of February. It’s just not helpful now.
If it’s solved it will be in spite of, not because of him, but he can have the credit as far as I’m concerned.
What Frank said - but let's get back to you supporting him no matter what he does
He's not a good CEO of anything. He owns a title because he inherited it and nothing more. He has failed up in everything he's ever done - all of his businesses have failed
to the point of him being sued for his participation. And yes, like most CEO's, that's
how many get to their position, by failing up. Talk a good game (which Trump doesn't do) but suck at CEO - so very many depend upon that golden parachute.
We have an entire country filled with CEO's who fail up. Remarkable isn't it?. So yes, they're a different breed as they mostly suck money out
of industry and are rarely good at the actual job of being a good steward of a company.
You lied when you implied you don't support Trump in everything he does and says - Fact is, you do.
but he beat HRC. Ha ha ha.
(no message)
Xi Jinping, Putin, Kim all won elections, Hitler's party won an election and Hitler became
Chancellor. Trump is in good company.
but he beat HRC
(no message)
Moron.
(no message)
Odd, that's what Trump said, those numbers would show he was a success.
where once again he was thinking about himself and not those who died or will die because he waited more than a month to react to a crisis something
he informed a nation was that number of 15 would soon be smaller - we have everything under control
Trump is more an unfeeling force of nature than a considerate & examined conscience.
The only issue is whether (1) his unfeeling force is used for good (encouraging the invisible, unfeeling and yet extremely beneficial hand of capitalism and limited government, which it seems to be doing so far...although the Wuhan Virus is a test for this) or whether (2) his unfeeling force is used for bad (which it would be if he promoted liberal policies).
The issue is not whether he has the right mindset, or enough compassion. The issue is whether he supports policies that will benefit those most in need, regardless of whether he is compassionate towards those most in need. Feel free to continue attacking his mindset (his rudeness, his self-centeredness). I will feel free to continue to ignore your attacks, and evaluate his policy decisions instead.
What you and 64 don't understand yet, is that I have no intention of defending Trump on that basis (some do, but many do not)...and that your arrows of personal criticism, even if they find their mark, do not cause any pain, and in some cases (when they are exposed as false attacks like collusion) actually strengthen the victim. Once you understand why that is, you will be able to develop a political attack that might actually not be counterproductive to your cause. Happily for me, you both seem oblivious to this.
Trump's rudeness and self-centeredness are just quirks of his personality. What makes him unfit to
govern (at any level) is his ignorance fueled by his incurious nature, his total lack of honesty (will lie about things big or small), his lack of accountability (nothing is ever his fault), his selfish nature (cares only about himself) and his total disinterest in serving his fellow man. He should back to running scams in NYC.
Of course you don't defend Trump by intention, it's by your force of nature, stupidity.
But then, you wrote all that to say nothing.