It is noteworthy that the substance of the claims against Biden are much stronger than the one against Kavanaugh......Reade did tell multiple others of the event at the time, her mother did call in to The Larry King and describe it as well and this is on tape, she was reassigned at that very time with no explanation in the Dem records, and Biden does have a long history of touching girls and hitting on women - even brazenly in front of the cameras and in front of their husbands.
Brett Kavanugh has to be raising an eyebrow at the difference in treatment he got from the main stream media jokers. But no one is surprised.
(no message)
(no message)
Cheeks would call you a bullshitter but really you’re a liar.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
in these cases of sexual assault. And this case has a lot more corroborative evidence than the one to which he was referring.
But it is getting hard for him to remember any of his escapades these days, I will give you that.
PS - you linked an op ed as if it were a supportive document. It is not. It is another hypocritical msm journalist who said one thing for Kavanaugh, and another for his political preference Biden.
Biden was emphatic in his denial. He asked the Secretary of the Senate Archives to search for any complaint by Ms. Reade because that is where the paper trail (if any) would be located.
Your "double standard" pitch is nonsense.
Vet these allegations on their facts.
Your gripe is not on the merits of the complaint. Rather, you simply want Biden to endure the same media gauntlet that Kavanaugh endured. Biden told Mika that the media should fully scrutinize Ms. Reade's complaint. Biden also said he would not attack her motives in making the allegation.
Biden said, "I am an open book."
No doubt Fox News will likewise scrutinize the 25 allegations against Trump.
Access them at all when the allegations surfaced?
In the same light that Trump does not want to disclose hist tax records or all his work product and communications since taking office (including to the stuff in the White House "vault"), Biden does not want his work product rummaged through for campaign fodder.
Ms. Read made a complaint per her account. That complaint, if it exists, is in the Senate Office Archives. Go look.
Hypocrite. Obviously he is worried about something there.
(no message)
Mika's very good questioning of Biden as to why he wants to seal his records from public view. He actually said that he has had meetings with foreign leaders including "Putin" and he doesn't want notes of those meetings to be "taken out of context". He utterly destroyed himself. How can Kavanaugh's HS yearbook warrant examination but Biden's public service records be off limits?
If this were Trump there would be a hissy fit on this Board over what he's trying to hide.
he has no access to. He has no personnel files in his archives. He was clear on that.
But I would have a care. The national archives are clearly without anything important since he offered them up.
The personal records at Delaware seem much more likely to show something since they have resisted, but Biden’s representatives we’re also given a chance to go through them and “clean them up” recently.
I think that there is enough to keep an investigation busy just from what is already known.
(no message)
She and the Dems are the only ones who can lecture all of us.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)