(no message)
(no message)
making up the entire story. Was it as bad as she claimed? Dunno. Did it begin consensually and then turn into something else? Dunno. Why 30 year old unprovable claims are just that. Despite her credibility, I would not have voted against him based on those claims.
(no message)
(no message)
to Larry King. I want to hear more though. I want to see a full investigation with a hearing on TV. If it comes out false, she should be sued for defamation of character.
I really didn’t pay attention here during Kavanaugh but did you believe Ford right off the bat?
(no message)
(no message)
interviewed yet.
Again, do you believe that all 17+ of Orange’s accusers are lying?
I have not looked into the 17 "accusers" you speak of. I'm sure if they are credible, they will resurface and have their time during this #metoo movement. I have not looked into Reade either other than what is on Twitter and the news.
I take it you were a big Ford believer?
What would you say the odds are that they are all lying? And Orange bragged about doing exactly what they claimed.
Like Orange, I though Ford testified credibly. I also said that 30 year allegations are essentially unprovable, and that I would have voted to approve Kavs.
(no message)
...is a candidate at his age.
......until Joe told me that I need to believe the woman when they come forward like this,and that while her facts may not be straight, to come forward so bravely in such a harsh setting means that it must have happened.
Joe told me that.
Joe needs to live by his own rules.
(no message)
She deserves the same chance that Blasey Ford got, right?
(no message)
(no message)
Prime time TV, questions need to be allowed from Biden's fellow senators on both sides of the aisle. Guests of the senators need to be allowed in the senate hearing room - maybe a hollywood starlet or two.
FBI vetting of Blasey Ford's complaints revealed nothing, yet the hearings were still said to be necessary because it was a job interview to the SCOTUS confirmation.
Now, we have a story with a lot more credibility - from a fellow Dem who was even on his team as a page. 4 witnesses corroborate that the reade told them of the event at the time that it happened (whereas Blasy Ford's witnesses denied that she ever told the story).
it seems only fair that we hear form this woman. She needs her chance to come forward and be heard, don't you think?
her chance to tell her story. This is a job interview, and we need to listen to her and Biden give their stories in their own words. Then, like with kavanaugh, we can decide if we think that they are lying.
Remember, in the case with Kavanaugh, he was vetted a total of 7 times without anything being found, but Joe himself still felt that she needed to be believed, and that she should have her televised stage to tell her story.
In fact, Kavanaugh's accuser gave witnesses that she said that would corroborate her story, but they denied her claims. Even so, she got her chance to tell her story. Blasey Ford was also a lifelong dem in a political appointment of a Republican and she still got her stage. In this case of Reade, she has 7 witnesses so far that corroborate her claim, and she is a lifelong Democrat without the same obvious political motive who even supported Biden enough to be a page on his team.
Why don't you respect women enough to offer the same treatment to Reade here?
By the way, every bit of this line of reasoning came directly from liberals and Biden himself during the Kavanaugh hearings.
Your rules now.
liked the size of her breasts.
He's sick man
(no message)
before deciding. Want see Sleepy griled for hrs on end and how he reacts.Leaning toward women right now,because Dims say she must be believed
Ditto with your side when one of theirs is accused. It's particularly repulsive when people on the Right play this game, given what many of them say about the injustice of campus kangaroo courts and the historical examples they decry, like Kavanaugh, Clarence Thomas, and probably some others I'm forgetting. They're willing to get behind any accusation against anyone from the opposite tribe, and the same is true of your tribe. I can't think of a single example of the ideologues on either side saying, "I don't believe this accusation" when a rival tribal member stands accused.
(no message)
As you've seen, I despise the phenomenon of left-wing judges, pols, and ACLU-types who help release dangerous criminals into our society, but I don't wish that they become victims. You're essentially hoping that Biden be falsely accused because he chose to embrace the "Believe all women" stance in the past.
them to attack their opponents.
Also, there are radical left wing voice in the Dem party and academia and the media that hold sway. They actually believe that women must be believed without offering proof. That somehow, they cannot lie about this sort of thing. If Dems are forced to realize the price of this themselves, there is also the hope that they will take the power away from these idiots.
proven false.
Make them feel the pain of their policies, and their policy making behavior tends to change.
see.
Democrats insisted that Christine Blasey Ford be completely believable and that Kavanaugh was unfit for office because of his obvious guilt, but with Biden – crickets. The difference of D's performances on these two cases is so stark. But it seems you didn't acknowledge it.
You know what you're doing with the Biden accusation and you ought to be embarrassed. You should be, but you won't.
we are simply reactive to D's action. We actually play defense by using D's playbook. I won't feel bad also because:
1 Reade' charge is far more credible – and relevant – than that of Christine Blasey Ford.
2. When you compare Biden of age of 50 to Kavanaugh being teenager, it is comparing apple to orange
3. There is an issue of potential abuse power by Biden, i.e. how Reade got fired.
(no message)
he did more to destroy the woman around him than most other men. What a role model.
I particularly like it when your tribe plays the gender card or the anti-Semitism card. Remember when people lampooning Palin were called "sexist" by your brethren? Or when someone is critical of Israel and he instantly becomes "anti-Semitic?" You guys love doing that right now. Man is that repulsive, because in both cases, you know how disingenuous you're being and you know how craven it is. Also the employment of faux outrage when it appears it will be fruitful to demagogue. Remember that jackass professor who made the lame joke that was a play on Barron Trump's name and the caucophony of wounded righties? That's a fine example. The idea is, "If the lefties can play this game, so can we!"
(no message)
Unsurprisingly, neither can fathom someone who doesn't conform to their pre-set, binary assumptions.
I find it refreshing. Since old man Bush took over for Reagan the liberals and media have been punching the RINO’s and they just want to be liked. Trump who is a Buffon doesn’t care. That’s why he has his base. Because people are angry with business as usual.
Why would any woman go public and expose herself to ridicule and threats from something that happened in high school? That’s what I was told. And I’m woke. What about you?
(no message)
Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htGmvHKcCNY
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
The incident is not as serious as what Reade claimed (sexual assault), but certainly not non-existent as Biden claimed. I think it is something similar to unwelcome sexual harassment. I am more interested in why Reade got fired. This may be a serious issue if Biden abused the power.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
expodentially recently
on his removal? Just swept under the rug. You must be pissed.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)