she spread lies in MSM interviews that they had evidence of collusion. She said that the Trump campaign conspired with Russia to influence the election. Went on CNN, MSNBC, networks, told newspapers that they had to save the evidence before Trump got in and destroyed it. Get a lawyer honey. But in her testimony she stated that she didn't know about any evidence that was collected. As did Susan Rice, Loretta Lynch, and Ben Rhodes, all denying they saw any evidence.
And how do we know this? It was in testimony released today by Adam Schiff's committee after a year and a half.
So ask yourself, 1) what took so long for this to come forward? 2) Why wasn't this in the Mueller Report? 3) Why did the media fail to report this information today? 4) And why does his Honor, the esteemed Adam Schiff continue to say that Trump colluded with Russia when the Obama administration people testified under oath before him that there was no evidence?
Care to venture a thought? Frankie, JimBob, Corona, ND521, LancePier, NeverplayedGolf, who have I left out of Russia Russia Russia board posters? Get ready, the hits will keep coming.
Maybe one of you might have the courage to admit being mislead. Read the Schiff testimony. It's enlightening. I know if I believed it for two years, I would feel like a fool.
Attached are all the transcripts. Read them.
Note that all the interviews took place during 2017-18, when Nunes controlled (obstructed) the House Intelligence Committee. Schiff was the minority ranking member in 2017-18. The GOP majority ran the show back then. The transcripts make that very clear.
Note that Obama Administration officials showed up and testified truthfully before the committee. Contrast Donald Trump and many of his circle who refused subpoenas in both Russian and Ukraine probes. Why? Because they did not want to be stuck either admitting to criminal wrongdoing or lying under oath.
The Mueller Report (very few of you bots have even read it) made clear that lack of access to key witnesses (Trump circle lawyering up) was a major obstacle in gathering vital witness information that prevented Mueller from gathering ample evidence to charge Conspiracy.
And Nunes (not only a piece of shit, but a really stupid piece of shit) was in bed with Trump, covering up the criminal wrongdoing in violation of Nunes’ oath of office. Nunes had the power to release all these transcripts in real time.
The witnesses you cite were not part of the Trump campaign. Nunes called them. They testified truthfully. And feel free to spend today reading them.
Link: https://intelligence.house.gov/russiainvestigation/
This is good reading. She is obviously lying and dissembling to cover herself. She now claims she can’t remember what she said and that her Morning Joe claims don’t really mean what she said. She also has no evidence of Russian Collusion.
To anyone with a brain, she also was calling govt workers to commit treason and to leak classified info.
And then there is Adam Schiff who is protecting the witness instead of being independent.
Conor, have you read a deposition before? Does this sound like a truth teller? Even if you say that she is telling the truth, she claims that her words in the tv interview meant something different than what she said....which means that she lied. So if she is telling the truth here, she is a liar. If she isn’t telling the truth here, she is also a liar.
And she did NOT have the evidence of collusion that she claimed in the interview.
Link: https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/ef15.pdf
(no message)
(no message)
Once again, Nunes ran the show in the House Intelligence committee until January 2019.
It was his show, as he endeavored to use his committee to run interference on behalf of Trump.
Nunes had the power to release the transcripts. He didn’t. Because they don’t help Trump.
Note Schiff’s letter (attached) explaining delay in releasing these transcripts was because of White House interference and stalling.
Link: https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/transcriptletter1.pdf
You're a fraud of a defense lawyer. The worst in all of history.
Link: https://twitter.com/alexsalvinews/status/1258956921907736576?s=19
against him.
And bot do we miss Trey Gowdy. He exposed them.
I saw a clip of him talking to Hannity and Gates called him out for not really doing anything with the subpoena power he had. Tucker had similar feelings on him, Graham and Grassley.
for his excellent questioning skils and the fact that we wouldn't know any of this without him in the same breath.
(no message)
campaign data, offering them a confidential campaign briefing all while that power is illegally hacking and publishing your opponent’s internal campaign e mails to help your campaign is wrong and traitorous. Then to top it off you go on the world stage to back the Russian dictator over your own govt when he claims he didn’t do what everyone knows he did. You can constantly shout squirrel all the time, but we know that all happened.
That’s also likely just the tip of the iceberg given the demonstrated Orange obstruction of the probe into it.
That is your disgraceful legacy to America.
(no message)
(no message)
Idea who Evelyn is, nor do I care. A third one, you are going to be paying my charity come November.
You’re a fraud you can’t even admit you might be wrong. Part of being adult is admitting when you have made a mistake. I have certainly made it clear my two votes for W were a huge mistake. You can’t admit you could possibly be wrong about the Russia collusion even though the evidence is hitting you in the face. Which tells me you are a child.
I’m not wrong about collusion. What was the tower meeting? What was Manafort giving internal campaign polling to Russia?
What was Russia illegally hacking the DNC and publishing stolen emails to help Orange?
Yeah, that happens every prez campaign.
Wake the fuck up.
(no message)
How infantile.
(no message)
Your frantic,mderanged tone doesn’t change those facts.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
I notice you still won’t answer my question. Tell me who has given evidence of collusion. You can’t so you scramble. It’s embarrassing. I doubt you’re a corporate lawyer. Your arguments are juvenile. You have been exposed. At best you’re a government lawyer handling workers compensation cases. Am I right?
sharing of campaign polling, and the illegal Russian hack of the DNC. Only someone disturbed would argue that those things didn’t happen.
Again, your personal attacks are infantile as your own attached post shows.
Link: https://forum.uhnd.com/forum/index.php?action=display&forumid=2&msgid=586295
evidence? Tell me what is in the public record? Sounds like a non answer to me. And yes I agreed earlier that it’s nice to have a reasonable argument on issues with a reasonable person. I thought someone called me an idgit, could that have been you?
But your responses are not reasonable. You just keep spouting your long held beliefs when they are unraveling. But that’s your way.
Do you deny there was a meeting at trump tower where Trump’s campaign discussed getting dirt on Hillary Clinton with agents of the Russian govt?
Do you deny that Paul Manafort gave internal campaign polling to a Putin ally oligarch?
Do you deny that Russia illegally the hacked the DNC and published stolen emails to help trump?
Do you deny that you have made personal attacks on me throughout this thread despite decrying such below?
Answer those questions. They aren’t that hard. You have become completely irrational and emotional on this subject.
That is normally a sign of desperation.
(no message)
have been wrong. His hatred won’t allow that.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)