They think that, of course, because their leaders want them to think that.
God forbid they ever learn anything.
(no message)
......that would be a good place to start looking for the leaker since the press would be breathless to get this out.
(no message)
authorized person or org, you can legally make request to unmask. That's not what we are talking about. We're looking at this unmasking Flynn within all surveillances and subsequent actions Obama admin did to understand why they did this and why they leaked it to media (which is illegal). Now with reveal of 30+ Obama admin officials involved unmasking, we know it is becoming more clear it is Obama admin that use that information to push a Russia collusion narrative on incoming Trump admin. That's why unmasking, legal though, Ms Power and many other Obama admin officials are reluctant to admit it, she made 6 requests in a short time though. They don't want people know it is them, not career IC people, who started this Russian collusion nonsense.
Does the article mention the reasons for the unmasking? You can't know if the unmasking was improper until you know the reasons.
And, which one do you think leaked the info? That was illegal. We know that crime was committed. We just don't know if it was Biden or someone else. (I suspect it was someone else, but his reason for asking to unmask is still of interest.)
This article just a distraction. It's what the Dems do (with their MSM defenders, who probably don't even understand the issues they are explaining, or they intentionally deflect from the heart of the matter to make it seem like nothing is wrong).
mix up the party’s, focus on how it was determined that he had lied.
Or, are you engaging in whataboutism, trying to justify what the D's did by mentioning Flynn's offense?
(no message)
(no message)
Why do you think they mask?
Why did the Obama unmask in such large numbers?
Why did so many ask for unmasking of Flynn?
Who leaked the Flynn phone call information to the press?
You guys worry about Trump, but you are fine with domestic spying when done by your side, so your opposition is not on principle; rather, your opposition to it is merely political. Wait until Trump starts doing this. I suspect your tune will change, confirming my statement that this is all politics.
You all are pushed around by us lefties.
he is, and lastly isn’t that what Herr Durham is supposed to be investigating in part?
FBI and Obama admin. only trump didn’t heed the warning leering to the 18 days of Flynn as intel chief?
That doesn't sound right to me, but maybe that makes sense in your world.
(no message)
Orange and his merry men have been playing the OJ squirrel, blame the process defense from day one here.
Interesting that it may bite them in the end hard.
Today, I saw a DNC spokeperson jump to Russia collusion to justify the unmasking. That was a rich distraction. When she was asked where the evidence was for that, she ran away as fast as she could to another distraction. Funny to watch.
the good general is in a whole new world of hurt, especially when you clowns are out on your ear next January and Barr has to go back to his cave.
He could well end up having screwed Flynn badly.
I'm sure he will come up with something to bog down the next administration for a couple years...maybe get an impeachment vote (the coup starts now, the GOP can tweet), and Trump only has to use techniques you support.
I still don't see how any of this can bite anybody. Flynn, by the way, is not the endgame here. He is merely part of the playing field. Unfortunately, that's what all of us Americans are now.
In the meantime in like Flynn may take on a whole new meaning.
(no message)
and no ability of other branches to oversee his or her ability to abuse that great power.
Give me a break.
Someone who goes by "Billy" can't be all that bad.
Google is your friend.