It was used to initially brief congress before Mueller was assigned to investigate , and reportedly showed that the agents thought Flynn was telling the truth. Now, it is gone.
What remains are 2 sets of hand written notes from the agents who interviewed Flynn - one is from an nonfamous agent which indicates that Flynn appears to be telling the truth, and the other notes are from Peter Strzok - the other agent which paint a completely different picture.
The original 302 is gone, but there is a new edited 302 that was prepared by Strzok which his attorneys say was edited in primarily “a stylistic and grammatical” way only. There are reports from many who originally saw or were briefed on the original 302 meeting summary that the report said that Flynn was telling the truth and that they recommended closing the case. That is not what the edited 302 says.
An original 302 interview summary backing Flynn would be problematic for pursuing an investigation against him.
Mr. Durham will undoubtedly be looking into this, and it will be interesting to hear the facts. At present, it sounds quite a bit like Hillary’s 30,000+ emails being deleted.
Link: https://tennesseestar.com/2020/01/20/flynn-lawyer-sidney-powell-we-have-a-witness-to-missing-exculpatory-fbi-302/
is a good offense. Make up shit so people will forget what a miserable job Donald has done with the economy and the virus. Nice try Barron, you make your Daddy proud. Btw Flynn pled guilty. Judge Sullivan asked Flynn"if he pled guilty because he was in fact guilty". Flynn replied "Yes". Go to jail, do not pass go.
A distraction. That Dem talking point even made its way to this board. Like good little cult followers, they just repeat what is being said by Joe from the basement and then on CNN.