Even Chris Cuomo is criticizing Judge Sullivan over the missing Flynn 302. Read.
(no message)
Link: https://twitter.com/ChrisCuomo/status/1262075638585921536?s=19
Replies to: Even Chris Cuomo is criticizing Judge Sullivan over the missing Flynn 302. Read.
For those who actually want to understand unmasking...and why this whole thing is ridiculous
Pissing into the wind, I know.
Link: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/05/17/only-culprit-unmasking-scandal-is-trump-administration/
Yeah, because Michael Morell is a completely non-partisan "journalist" that we should all believe
Just a snippet of a few of his past article titles:
Trump and Barr are crossing another line
The tragedy is that we knew this was coming
Can John Ratcliffe rise above Trumpism?
I am guessing he is pretty tight it Strzok, Page, Clapper, Brennan, etc....
He's not a journalist. He is a lifelong intel professional. Worked for five presidents.
You know, the kind of person that Trumpies do not trust, because they tend to recognize a corrupt shit show when they see it.
What percentage of unmasking requests are denied?
(no message)
This should be pinned at top of forum
Or in the least on the foreheads of Baron, Eli, Neddie, Cole, ColeyO/Dorothy, Tampa and Chad.
When in doubt, loop back to 'They are framing Michael Flynn for crimes he already confessed to...'
(no message)
Anyone who cannot acknowledge the corruption here is beyond all reason.
(no message)
Bill Barr is completely corrupt. Spends all his time trying to keep the Trump crime fam out of jail.
(no message)
Really? Are you a great acknowledger of corruption?
(no message)
Yes. Sullivan is corrupt. Obama DOJ was corrupt. I acknowledge it. Now Jim.......
....what's your explanation for the missing 302? I'm sure you haven't heard much on this from your CNN, so you have to read up on it.
.
(no message)
Okay. Explain Obama and Sullivan corruption vis a vis Trump.
So far you’re a wisher and not much of a truth teller.
So no answer for the missing 302. Thought so.
(no message)
You brought up Obama and Sullivan - tell us how they’re corrupt.
I knew you would and couldn’t answer 1. Because you and you ilk (trump) invented the corruption 2. Because there isn’t any corruption.
answer the question instead of dodging and deflecting. what about the 302? answer that, than ask
your questions.
He can’t, so he dodges. He does it all of the time. He’s awaiting spin from the msm.
(no message)
No Baron, you dodged the question. Explain Obama & Sullivan corruption
(no message)
Hey, moron you must have in reading.
(no message)
that's not even a sentence.
and any time you want to match credentials, let me know.
meantime, pretty sure you're not intelligent enough to answer baron's question, but, go ahead and give it a shot if you dare to further expose your feeble mind.
Well, when he asks one I’ll answer it. In the meantime, stack up those credentials, champ!
(no message)
MSM, right?
You are also barking up the wrong tree as Sullivan is known to be very harsh on prosecutor misconduct.
Is he part of the conspiracy now?
Things get lost, it just happens: That
is pretty weak sauce in a high profile case like this.He needs to do better if he wants to appear above the fray
So, where do you stand? With the judge, or with Cole?
The judge: "[T]hings happen and documents are lost. I mean, it just happens." The document that is the basis for the prosecution is lost. No biggie.
Unless there is evidence it was destroyed on purpose, the judge is right.
Flynn knew it was missing and plead guilty anyway. He told the same lie to Pence which would be hard to explain. He also knew they could have charged him as an unregistered foreign agent of Turkey which he also admitted in the plea.
Do you think a judge can convict when both defense and prosecution agree case should be dismissed?
(no message)
Convict? He’s already been convicted.
The issue is whether the judge has to allow the dismissal because the govt NOW wants to dismiss the case even though there is already a guilty plea. Or, can the judge refuse to allow the plea to be withdrawn, and not allow the dismissal? In no way shape or form will the judge either convict or not convict him. You did go to law school, right? Have you ever practiced law?
Solid point, asshole.
:-)
I didn't know he was formally convicted. I thought the conviction was held in abeyance (or whatever criminal lawyers call that type of thing) pending the outcome of his cooperation. Perhaps it was just the sentencing. Whatever. I do think if he was already convicted, and he is just awaiting sentencing, that does change things a bit.
Note to Cole, Flynn pled guilty. When Judge Sullivan asked Flynn if he was pleading guilty because
he was in fact guilty Flynn answered in the affirmative. Case closed, go directly to jail,