(no message)
Link: https://twitter.com/ASlavitt/status/1270135499659923458?s=20
to stoke the fear again.
This is an idiot reporter who claims he’s talked to 4 anonymous scientists “and the WH” (whose knowledge he normally disparages), and he boldly claims with no expertise himself that he believes that this was an irresponsible statement by WHO WHICH WAS BASED ON LEGITIMATE OBSERVATIONS”.
Wtf does this mean?!!!!! If the observations are legitimate, then the statement by the WHO is legitimate, yet the msm headlines now have walked back the good news, and every lib I know has already been programmed to think that the good news has been retracted. Use your freaking head, man! This is BS.
They were unclear in their messaging. Hence the retraction. Or so, I'm told.
About presymptomatic was added after the fact when Obama’s people (Slavitt) called the WHO so that they could justify continued shut down advocation.
(no message)
(no message)
A person should be able to expect accurate and timely information on a global pandemic from the WHO. Yet, they worked with China to suppress critical information about the virus when it was needed most.
Fast forward to yesterday and they publish new information only to be rebutted and questioned via Twitter?
Whiskey, Tango, Foxtrot.
The guy at the link approached them, and they backed off their own most recent claim, and have now scheduled a slipstream conference call to explain what they meant to say.
(no message)
(no message)
would be certainly quarantined just like we treat other contagious disease. So the lockdown is totally avoidable if this WHO's claim is true. It also means extensive testing is unnecessary. Who-gets-sick-who-gets-testing is a correct testing approach. As a lockdown supporter, you should throw more cold water on WHO.
to foment righteousness and anger by distorting even further the WHO ill timed and ill said statement.
We lose in politics what we should have in honesty from first our elected government and second a health organization which is counted on for its vision.
Dim: We lose in politics what we should have in honesty from first our elected government and second a health organization which is counted on for its vision.
Google: Wut?
then have them explain it to you and Dorothy in your language
(no message)
Their opinions have been all over the place and repeatedly wrong. The media selects them based on their support for an agenda. The peoples' agenda has turned and most no longer see COVID 19 as a serious threat.
Especially when at best it is incomplete?
I actually know not one person who has tested positive for COVID 19, and of course no one who has died. On this basis, I have no real fear of the disease
(no message)
(no message)