(no message)
Link: https://ndsmcobserver.com/2020/07/alumn-priest-abuse/
If only there were some way, some people, who could recognize homosexual men...
Link: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/the-hot-button/the-sixth-sense-do-women-really-have-gaydar/article615431/
(no message)
Remember how the Girl Scouts went bankrupt...oh...wait...
I think you should post that link again which so beautifully lays out the mental gymnastics and sophistry by which the statistics are manipulated.
(no message)
(no message)
I can't tell you how wrong this is on SO many levels if true about this rector. I understand his position of authority as well as the fact that a freshman is not really an adult despite what the law says.
But he went in, joined him under the covers, and then took instruction on how to have gay sex.
How is that not consensual? A rector doesn't control your grades or any other meaningful part of your life to argue that he was coerced.
If true, the priest was a degenerate pig, and based on his subsequent history elsewhere, it appears to be most likely accurate. I'd be beyond furious if i were a parent. but where does the element of personal choice enter in here? How would the priest know that his seduction was unwanted rather than simply successful? The guy kept coming back to meet with him, and then by his own words chose to "join him" in his bed. He also had several more sexual encounters thereafter.
If you want to argue that all sex between faculty and students is rape, I'd be willing to consider that, but if not, then how was this not consensual?
(no message)