Jim is literally unable to understand this discussion (and even if he were, he won’t ever change his mind based on evidence since his decisions revolve around politics).
But you joined him in jumping at some new “lefty” media reports (Jim’s own description) discounting chloroquine without even providing a link.
Where I trained, we always provided studies to evaluate as part of scientific debate. Has that changed?
(no message)
It is crazy to believe that the medical establishment is holding back on this drug because to use it would help the president.
If it worked, it would be ubiquitous.
Link: https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/06/three-big-studies-dim-hopes-hydroxychloroquine-can-treat-or-prevent-covid-19
IT was you guys damning the drug without evidence
It is under review and will be for a while
Looks very promising in icu setting
A reasonable off label choice wihen other options not helping
Whitmer never ever should have banned its ise across the board even for off label
I will look but im betting your studies are evaluating aa different metric such as prophylaxis, etc. will look
Your medical advice here sits along side Donnie Douchebags qualifications to be POTUS.
(no message)