fantasy under the foolish notion that this will hurt Trump? I'm not kidding. Trump must be elated over this.
Another person who's undoubtedly enjoying this is leftie journalist, Aaron Mate, who spent three deconstructing the Russia collusion fantasy.
Link: https://twitter.com/aaronjmate/status/1295783850967273480
Manafort gave internal campaign polling data to a known Russian intelligence agent. Campaign managers do that all the time, right?
He offered a private campaign briefing to another oligarch close to Putin. They also do that all the time, right?
The report described him a grave counter intelligence threat. That is another common experience for a prez campaign manager.
This same campaign manager, Kushner, and Little Orange also meet with a representative of the Russian govt to get dirt on their opponent. Big Orange lies about it as a meeting about adoptions.
Yet none of that is collusion in yer book? You think that’s perfectly acceptable campaign behavior, right?
The sky was yellow and the sun was blue.
If you had to summon up the energy to create a ranking for this board, who would you have in the top five, in terms of intelligence?
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Into this silliness:
1. The DOJ never warned Trump as they did other candidates including Hillary.
- they argue that they didnt want to spook Trump in his activity and thus violated SOP, but that assumption already indicates an illegal bias. It also ignores that they DID trust HRC who was just found to havebeen keeping an illegal server from which over 30k emails of vlassified govt focuments made their way to hostile countries.....odd.
b - Trump had Manafort on his team for only a month or two before firing him himself. Not the behavior of someone using Manafort as a go between. At minimum in this lib fantasy, that was impressive intuition on Trump's part.
iii). The libs still have to buy in to the idea that a half a million ads bought on Facebook coerced and tricked voters into voting for Trump. And when you look at those ads, they are farcical.
The real problem here is that liberals cant admit that they are wrong, and they dont accept it when they lose.
I also strongly suspect that the DOJ planned to spring this accusation on Trumps campaign if they hired him ala Carter Paige.
Intelligent my ass.
It further tore apart the country and set a terrible precedent for the future.
We have folks who have been unwilling to accept the results of an election for four years, who cannot properly articulate criticisms of Trump in a way that is persuasive to Americans, thus they are left with boogeymen and tacitly or explicitly supporting violence and mayhem in the streets.
That's why there had to be all of these excuses. Russia bought Facebook ads!!! Hacked voting machines!!!
All of this divisiveness and propaganda because their drunken hag didn't get "her turn."
Along with the fact that white police and Republicans are murdering all our black voters!
(no message)
Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLjVUCb6xVQ
Just the other night during a panel, some idiot screeched that Trump was having mailboxes removed, even though that hoax was widely and immediately corrected after it was first "reported."
Did Jake Tapper correct his interviewee......? No.
(no message)
(no message)
shirt made up. You guys want one? My treat.
It matters for history.
Of course he solicited and encouraged Russian help. But his voters won’t care.
(no message)
He was Trump's 2016 campaign manager.
He fed confidential polling information to a Russian intelligence agent at the same time that the Russian government was seeking to interfere in the election on behalf of Donald Trump.
No collusion!
And if you still believe that Russia did not interfere in 2016 election, then you are illiterate.
If you still believe that members of the Trump campaign were not working in collusion with Russian agents, then you are illiterate.
Link: https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/press/senate-intel-releases-volume-5-bipartisan-russia-report
interchanges between Trump and Russians with ties to the Kremlin prior to the election, interference by the Kremlin in the US 2016 elections
and who the players were at the time but no, as both says, they were not looking to find criminality but they did say the actions were
there. Specifically with ties to the Kremlin.
Collusion? probably but not a subject that was looked into.
The lie that continues is - Trump and his campaign didn't communicate directly or indirectly with players acting for the Kremlin, in fact
they had no communications at all with the Kremlin though Roger Stone and Manafort did exactly that.
Yeah, it's a red herring but only for those who support Trump.
Resurrected? No, just keeping a light on it so it is not forgotten. This a Republican Senate committee.
Thanks Bill Barr for your analysis of the Mueller Report.
But please, keep going with this nonsense. Not only does it inspire laughter on the right, but a good deal of laughing on the left, as well. Absolutely clueless.
Instead they took Barr’s word for it. And Trump’s.
"collusion" in a more expansive investigation of the allegation, but Chris, objectively, did.
of the campaign with taking part in a criminal conspiracy. It was not." He continues - "we did not evaluate collusion" and he says, "The president was not exculpated for the acts that he allegedly committed".
And more - "We did not address collusion which is not a legal term, rather we focused on ..."
You're using Trump's words - they are not the truth or factual therefore you are lying.
(no message)
(no message)
Again, Mueller did not find sufficient evidence.
Link: https://www.npr.org/2019/03/24/706385781/mueller-report-finds-evidence-of-russian-collusion
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
Link: https://twitter.com/aaronjmate/status/1295782765422686209